[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.1 Populating the Model<br />
5. VALUE MODEL RESULTS<br />
In order to demonstrate the use of the model, a hypothetical scenario was built, in<br />
which the decision maker has to define the priorities among a set of OCRs. The OCRs<br />
chosen for this particular scenario are related to aircraft systems with fundamentally<br />
different purposes and characteristics (e.g. fighters and helicopters), so that the flexibility<br />
and scope of the model could be demonstrated.<br />
It is important to emphasize that, when applicable, the value output of the system<br />
requested by an OCR was compared with the value output of the system it was supposed<br />
to replace. In this case, the value of interest for the decision context is the marginal<br />
contribution to the BAF‘s operational capability provided by that specific aircraft system<br />
(i.e. the difference between utilities).<br />
On the other hand, the aircraft systems supposed to provide a completely new<br />
capability to the BAF or to replace a system in the retirement phase of its life cycle were<br />
not compared with any other alternative. Therefore, when this situation applied, the<br />
utility yielded by the model was directly used in the ranking of alternatives.<br />
An OCR is not supposed to request specific aircraft systems, but only needed<br />
capabilities, thus the equipments used in this example are fictional. Nevertheless, data<br />
70