02.08.2013 Views

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.1 Populating the Model<br />

5. VALUE MODEL RESULTS<br />

In order to demonstrate the use of the model, a hypothetical scenario was built, in<br />

which the decision maker has to define the priorities among a set of OCRs. The OCRs<br />

chosen for this particular scenario are related to aircraft systems with fundamentally<br />

different purposes and characteristics (e.g. fighters and helicopters), so that the flexibility<br />

and scope of the model could be demonstrated.<br />

It is important to emphasize that, when applicable, the value output of the system<br />

requested by an OCR was compared with the value output of the system it was supposed<br />

to replace. In this case, the value of interest for the decision context is the marginal<br />

contribution to the BAF‘s operational capability provided by that specific aircraft system<br />

(i.e. the difference between utilities).<br />

On the other hand, the aircraft systems supposed to provide a completely new<br />

capability to the BAF or to replace a system in the retirement phase of its life cycle were<br />

not compared with any other alternative. Therefore, when this situation applied, the<br />

utility yielded by the model was directly used in the ranking of alternatives.<br />

An OCR is not supposed to request specific aircraft systems, but only needed<br />

capabilities, thus the equipments used in this example are fictional. Nevertheless, data<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!