[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

Utility
ACFT Force Ap.
(32.07%)
Table 5. Variation of Weight on Force Application.
ACFT Force Ap.
(42.07%)
81
ACFT Force Ap.
(22.07%)
FTR 0.488 FTR 0.549 FTR 0.447
ASW 0.415 ASW 0.44 ASW 0.402
UAV 0.272 UAV 0.262 UAV 0.296
CGO 0.23 CGO 0.243 CGO 0.244
HLA 0.167 HLA 0.21 HLA 0.136
0.840
0.020
0 10
0
Percent of Weight on Force Application
Figure 40. Weight Variation on Force Application.
Similarly to the previous figure, the weight line on Force Awareness is right over
the switchover point between UAV and HLA (see fig. 41). But this time, an increase in
weight will increase the UAV‘s utility and decrease the HLA‘s utility. The inverse occurs
if the weight is decreased. Also, there is a switchover point between UAV and CGO
relatively close to the weight line.
Fighter (FTR)
Anti-submarine (ASW)
Helicopter A (HLA)
Cargo (CGO)
Unmanned (UAV)
Helicopter B (HLB)