02.08.2013 Views

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This type of analysis looks for points where two or more options are equated in<br />

overall utility, the so called switchover points. These points are important because if the<br />

results are ―remote from switchover points, the analyst can be confident of his<br />

conclusions.‖ 123 If not, any small variation on the weights can change the ranking of the<br />

alternatives.<br />

The first graph (see fig. 40) shows the effects of varying the weight on the Force<br />

Application objective. The line representing this objective‘s weight is next to a<br />

switchover point between UAV and HLA, which means that small variations in weight<br />

could change the ranking order between them. Since the utility value used to rank HLA is<br />

based on the comparison with HLB, the sole interpretation of the graph is not enough<br />

because the value of interest in this case is the marginal contribution provided by HLA.<br />

There is also a switchover point between HLA and CGO and the same rationale applies.<br />

In order to check if any change in the rank of the alternatives would really<br />

happen, a table was built with variations of +/- 10% in the Force Application‘s weight.<br />

The results show that, although the HLA‘s utility increases, the ranking of the<br />

alternatives remains unchanged.<br />

123 Ibid., 400.<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!