[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 43. Weight Variation on Force Support.<br />
This first part of the analysis showed that the results are robust for most of the<br />
alternatives. The exception is related to the UAV and CGO aircraft systems, which<br />
showed some sensitivity to variations in the weights of Force Awareness and Force<br />
Mobility.<br />
Utility<br />
0.574<br />
0.000 0 100<br />
6.2 Hypothetical Scenarios<br />
Percent of Weight on Force<br />
Support<br />
The second part of the sensitivity analysis proposes two simple hypothetical<br />
scenarios to check if significant changes occur in the ranking of the alternatives. The<br />
hypothetical DM was asked to change the weights of the fundamental objectives,<br />
according to his assessment of the scenario in hand. A short description of the proposed<br />
scenarios can be found in Appendix 6.<br />
85<br />
Helicopter B (HLB)<br />
Cargo (CGO)<br />
Anti-submarine (ASW)<br />
Fighter (FTR)<br />
Helicopter A (HLA)<br />
Unmanned (UAV)