06.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

lesser extent. Corn feedstock minus DDGS sale credits represents about 50% <strong>of</strong> the final<br />

per-gallon cost, while utilities, capital <strong>and</strong> labor comprise about 20%, 10%, <strong>and</strong> 5%,<br />

respectively. For this work, we used corn price projections from USDA <strong>of</strong> $2.23 per bushel<br />

in 2012 for the 7.2 bill gal/yr case, <strong>and</strong> an adjusted value <strong>of</strong> $2.31 per bushel for the 9.6 bill<br />

gal/yr case 61 . The adjustment at the higher volume case was taken from work done by<br />

FAPRI <strong>and</strong> EIA. 62,63 Prices used for DDGS were $65 per ton in the 7.2 bill gal/yr case <strong>and</strong><br />

$55 per ton in the 9.6 case, based on work by FAPRI <strong>and</strong> EIA. 64 Energy prices were derived<br />

from historical data <strong>and</strong> projected to 2012 using EIA’s AEO 2006. 65 While we believe the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> USDA <strong>and</strong> FAPRI estimates for corn <strong>and</strong> DDGS prices is reasonable, additional<br />

modeling work is being done for the final rulemaking using the Forestry <strong>and</strong> Agricultural<br />

Sector Optimization Model described further in Chapter 8 <strong>of</strong> the RIA.<br />

The estimated average corn ethanol production cost <strong>of</strong> $1.20 per gallon in 2012 (2004<br />

dollars) in the case <strong>of</strong> 7.2 bill gal/yr <strong>and</strong> $1.26 per gallon in the case <strong>of</strong> 9.6 bill gal/yr<br />

represents the full cost to the plant operator, including purchase <strong>of</strong> feedstocks, energy<br />

required for operations, capital depreciation, labor, overhead, <strong>and</strong> denaturant, minus revenue<br />

from sale <strong>of</strong> co-products. It does not account for any subsidies on production or sale <strong>of</strong><br />

ethanol. This cost is independent <strong>of</strong> the market price <strong>of</strong> ethanol, which has been related<br />

closely to the wholesale price <strong>of</strong> gasoline for the past decade. 66,67<br />

Under the Energy Act, starch-based ethanol can be counted as cellulosic if at least<br />

90% <strong>of</strong> the process energy is derived from renewable feedstocks, which include plant<br />

cellulose, municipal solid waste, <strong>and</strong> manure biogas. 68 It is expected that the 250 million<br />

gallons per year <strong>of</strong> cellulosic ethanol production required by 2013 will be made using this<br />

provision. While we have been unable to develop a detailed production cost estimate for<br />

corn ethanol meeting cellulosic criteria, we assume that the costs will not be significantly<br />

different from conventionally produced corn ethanol. We believe this is reasonable because<br />

these processes will simply be corn ethanol plants with additional fuel h<strong>and</strong>ling mechanisms<br />

that allow them to combust waste materials for process energy instead <strong>of</strong> natural gas. We<br />

expect them to be in locations where the very low or zero cost <strong>of</strong> the waste material or biogas<br />

itself will likely <strong>of</strong>fset the costs <strong>of</strong> hauling it <strong>and</strong>/or the additional capital for processing <strong>and</strong><br />

firing it, making them cost-competitive with conventional corn ethanol plants. Furthermore,<br />

because the quantity <strong>of</strong> ethanol produced using these processes is still expected to be a<br />

61<br />

USDA Agricultural Baseline Projections to 2015, Report OCE-2006-1<br />

62<br />

EIA NEMS model for ethanol production, updated for AEO 2006<br />

63<br />

Food <strong>and</strong> Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) study entitled “Implications <strong>of</strong> Increased<br />

Ethanol Production for U.S. Agriculture”, FAPRI-UMC Report #10-05<br />

64<br />

Food <strong>and</strong> Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) U.S. <strong>and</strong> World Agricultural Outlook, January<br />

2006, FAPRI Staff Report 06-FSR 1<br />

65<br />

Historical data at http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_allmg_d_nus_PTA_cpgal_m.htm (gasoline),<br />

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_nus_m.htm (natural gas),<br />

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/sales_revenue.xls (electricity),<br />

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/page/acr/table28.html (coal); EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2006, Tables<br />

8, 12, 13, 15; EIA website<br />

66<br />

Whims, J., Sparks Companies, Inc. <strong>and</strong> Kansas State University, “Corn Based Ethanol Costs <strong>and</strong><br />

Margins, Attachment 1” (Published May 2002)<br />

67<br />

Piel, W.J., Tier & Associates, Inc., March 9, 2006 report on costs <strong>of</strong> ethanol production <strong>and</strong> alternatives<br />

68<br />

Energy Policy Act <strong>of</strong> 2005, Section 1501 amending Clean Air Act Section 211(o)(1)(A).<br />

- 136 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!