06.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table VIII.A.3-1<br />

Well-to-Pump Emissions for Producing <strong>and</strong> Distributing <strong>Renewable</strong> <strong><strong>Fuel</strong>s</strong><br />

(grams per gallon ethanol or biodiesel) a<br />

Pollutant Ethanol Biodiesel<br />

VOC 3.6 41.5<br />

CO 4.4 25.1<br />

NOx 10.8 44.3<br />

PM10 6.1 1.5<br />

SOx 7.2 7.5<br />

a Includes credit for reduced distribution <strong>of</strong> gasoline <strong>and</strong><br />

diesel fuel<br />

At the same time, areas with refineries might experience reduced emissions, not<br />

necessarily relative to current emission levels, but relative to those which would have<br />

occurred in the future had renewable fuel use not risen. However, to the degree that<br />

increased renewable fuel use reduces imports <strong>of</strong> gasoline <strong>and</strong> diesel fuel, as opposed to<br />

the domestic production <strong>of</strong> these fuels, these reduced refinery emissions will occur<br />

overseas <strong>and</strong> not in the U.S.<br />

Similarly, areas with MTBE production facilities might experience reduced<br />

emissions from these plants as they cease producing MTBE. However, many <strong>of</strong> these<br />

plants may be converted to produce other gasoline blendstocks, such as iso-octane or<br />

alkylate. In this case, their emissions are not likely to change substantially.<br />

B. Impact on Emission Inventories<br />

We use the NMIM to estimate emissions under the various ethanol scenarios on a<br />

county by county basis. NMIM basically runs MOBILE6.2 <strong>and</strong> NONROAD2005 with<br />

county-specific inputs pertaining to fuel quality, ambient conditions, levels <strong>of</strong> onroad<br />

vehicle VMT <strong>and</strong> nonroad equipment usage, etc. We ran NMIM for two months, July<br />

<strong>and</strong> January. We estimate annual emission inventories by summing the two monthly<br />

inventories <strong>and</strong> multiplying by six.<br />

As described above, we removed the effect <strong>of</strong> gasoline fuel quality on exhaust<br />

VOC <strong>and</strong> NOx emissions from the onroad motor vehicle inventories which are embedded<br />

in MOBILE6.2. We then applied the exhaust emission effects from the EPA Predictive<br />

Models. In our primary analysis, we only applied these EPA Predictive Model effects to<br />

exhaust VOC <strong>and</strong> NOx emissions from Tier 0 vehicles. In a sensitivity case, we applied<br />

them to exhaust VOC <strong>and</strong> NOx emissions from all vehicles. Regarding the effect <strong>of</strong> fuel<br />

quality on emissions <strong>of</strong> four air toxics from nonroad equipment (in terms <strong>of</strong> their fraction<br />

<strong>of</strong> VOC emissions), in all cases we replaced the fuel effects contained in NMIM with<br />

those for motor vehicles contained in MOBILE6.2. The projected emission inventories<br />

for the primary analysis are presented first, followed by those for the sensitivity analysis.<br />

- 162 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!