06.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

as on the exports <strong>of</strong> agricultural products like corn. See section X <strong>of</strong> the preamble for a<br />

discussion on agricultural sector impacts.<br />

In 2005, the United States imported almost 60 percent <strong>of</strong> the oil it consumed.<br />

This compares to just over 35 percent oil imports in 1975. 96 Transportation accounts for<br />

70% <strong>of</strong> the U.S. oil consumption. It is clear that oil imports have a significant impact on<br />

the U.S. economy. Exp<strong>and</strong>ed production <strong>of</strong> renewable fuel is expected to contribute to<br />

energy diversification <strong>and</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> domestic sources <strong>of</strong> energy. We consider<br />

whether the RFS will reduce U.S. dependence on imported oil by calculating avoided<br />

expenditures on petroleum imports. Note that we do not calculate whether this reduction<br />

is socially beneficially, which would depend on the scarcity value <strong>of</strong> domestically<br />

produced ethanol versus that <strong>of</strong> imported petroleum products.<br />

To assess the impact <strong>of</strong> the RFS program on petroleum imports, the fraction <strong>of</strong><br />

domestic consumption derived from foreign sources was estimated using results from the<br />

AEO 2006. In section 6.4.1 <strong>of</strong> the DRIA we describe how fuel producers change their<br />

mix in response to a decrease in fuel dem<strong>and</strong>. We do not expect the projected reductions<br />

in petroleum consumption (0.3 to 0.57 Quads) to impact world oil prices by a measurable<br />

amount. We base this assumption on the overall size <strong>of</strong> worldwide petroleum dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the AEO 2006 cases. As a consequence, domestic crude oil production for the<br />

7.5 or 9.9 cases would not be expected to change significantly versus the RFS reference<br />

case. Thus, petroleum reductions will come largely from reductions in net petroleum<br />

imports. This conclusion is confirmed by comparing the AEO 2006 low macroeconomic<br />

growth case to the AEO 2006 reference case, as discussed in the RIA 6.4.1. The AEO<br />

2006 shows that for a reduction in petroleum dem<strong>and</strong> on the order <strong>of</strong> the reductions<br />

estimated for the RFS, net imports will account for approximately 95% <strong>of</strong> the reductions.<br />

However, if petroleum reductions were large enough to impact world oil prices, the mix<br />

<strong>of</strong> domestic crude oil, imports <strong>of</strong> finished products, <strong>and</strong> imports <strong>of</strong> crude oil used by fuel<br />

producers would change. We discuss this uncertainty in more detail in section 6.4.1 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

RIA <strong>and</strong> solicit comments to the extent by which the RFS may have a price effect <strong>and</strong><br />

impact the imports <strong>of</strong> crude oil <strong>and</strong> refined products.<br />

We quantified the fraction <strong>of</strong> net petroleum imports that would be crude oil versus<br />

finished products. Comparison <strong>of</strong> same cases in the AEO 2006 shows that finished<br />

products initially compose all the net import reductions, followed by imported crude oil<br />

once reductions in consumption reach beyond 1.2 Quads <strong>of</strong> petroleum product. However,<br />

there is significant uncertainty in quantifying how refineries will change their mix <strong>of</strong><br />

sources with a decrease in petroleum dem<strong>and</strong>, particularly at the levels estimated for the<br />

RFS. For example, a comparison between the AEO low price case (as opposed to low<br />

macroeconomic growth case) <strong>and</strong> the reference case would yield a 50-50 split between<br />

product <strong>and</strong> crude imports. We believe that the actual refinery response could range<br />

between these two points, so that finished product imports would compose between 50 to<br />

100% <strong>of</strong> the net import reductions, with crude oil imports making up the remainder. For<br />

the purposes <strong>of</strong> this rulemaking, we show values for the case where net import reductions<br />

96 Davis, Stacy C.; Diegel, Susan W., Transportation Energy Data Book: 25 th Edition, Oak Ridge National<br />

Laboratory, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Energy, ORNL-6974, 2006.<br />

- 185 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!