06.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

content. Table VIII.A.1.c-1 shows the effect <strong>of</strong> adding 11 volume percent MTBE or 10<br />

volume percent ethanol to non-oxygenated gasoline on these emissions.<br />

Base <strong>Fuel</strong><br />

Table VIII.A.1.c-1<br />

Effect MTBE <strong>and</strong> Ethanol on Nonroad Exhaust Emissions<br />

4-Stroke Engines 2-Stroke Engines<br />

11 Volume<br />

Percent MTBE<br />

10 Volume<br />

Percent Ethanol<br />

11 Volume<br />

Percent MTBE<br />

10 Volume<br />

Percent Ethanol<br />

Exhaust VOC -9% -15% -1% -1%<br />

Non-Exhaust VOC 0% 26% 0% 26%<br />

CO -13% -21% -8% -12%<br />

NOx +24% +37% +12% +18%<br />

As can be seen, higher oxygen content reduces exhaust VOC <strong>and</strong> CO emissions<br />

significantly, but also increases NOx emissions. However, NOx emissions from these<br />

engines tend to be fairly low to start with, given the fact that these engines run much<br />

richer than stoichiometric. Thus, a large percentage increase <strong>of</strong> a relative low base value<br />

can be a relatively small increase in absolute terms.<br />

Evaporative emissions from nonroad equipment are impacted by only RVP, <strong>and</strong><br />

permeation by ethanol content. Both the RVP increase due to blending <strong>of</strong> ethanol <strong>and</strong> its<br />

permeation effect cause non-exhaust VOC emissions to increase with the use <strong>of</strong> ethanol<br />

in nonroad equipment. The 26 percent effect represents the average impact across the<br />

U.S. in July for both 2-stroke <strong>and</strong> 4-stroke equipment. We updated the NONROAD2005<br />

hose permeation emission factors for small spark-ignition engines <strong>and</strong> recreational<br />

marine watercraft to reflect the use <strong>of</strong> ethanol.<br />

For nonroad toxics emissions, we base our estimates <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> fuel quality<br />

on the fraction <strong>of</strong> exhaust VOC emissions represented by each toxic on MOBILE6.2 (i.e.,<br />

the same effects predicted for onroad vehicles). The National Mobile Inventory Model<br />

(NMIM) contains estimates <strong>of</strong> the fraction <strong>of</strong> VOC emissions represented by the various<br />

air toxics based on oxygenate type (none, MTBE or ethanol). However, estimates for<br />

nonroad gasoline engines running on different fuel types are limited, making it difficult to<br />

accurately model the impacts <strong>of</strong> changes in fuel quality. In the recent NPRM addressing<br />

mobile air toxic emissions, EPA replaced the toxic-related fuel effects contained in<br />

NMIM with those from MOBILE6.2 for onroad vehicles. 85 We follow the same<br />

methodology here. Future testing could significantly alter these emission impact<br />

estimates.<br />

2. Diesel <strong>Fuel</strong> Quality: Biodiesel<br />

EPA assessed the impact <strong>of</strong> biodiesel fuel on emissions in 2002 <strong>and</strong> published a<br />

draft report summarizing the results. 86 At that time, most <strong>of</strong> the data available was for<br />

85 71, Federal Register, 15804, March 29, 2006.<br />

86 “A Comprehensive Analysis <strong>of</strong> Biodiesel Impacts on Exhaust Emissions,” Draft Technical Report, U.S.<br />

- 160 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!