06.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Standard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table VIII.A.1.b-2<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> MTBE <strong>and</strong> Ethanol in Conventional Gasoline on Tier 0 Vehicle Emissions<br />

Relative to a Typical Non-Oxygenated Conventional Gasoline a<br />

Pollutant Source 11 Volume 10 Volume<br />

Percent MTBE Percent Ethanol b<br />

Exhaust VOC EPA Predictive Models -9.2% -7.4%<br />

NOx<br />

2.6% 7.7%<br />

CO c<br />

MOBILE6.2 -6% / -11% -11% / -19%<br />

Exhaust Benzene EPA Predictive <strong>and</strong><br />

-22% -27%<br />

Formaldehyde Complex Models<br />

+10% +3%<br />

Acetaldehyde -8% +141%<br />

1,3-Butadiene<br />

-12% -27%<br />

Non-Exhaust VOC MOBILE6.2 Zero +17%<br />

Non-Exhaust Benzene MOBILE6.2 & Complex<br />

Models<br />

-10% +13%<br />

a<br />

Average per vehicle effects for the 2012 fleet during summer conditions<br />

b<br />

Assumes a 1.0 psi RVP waiver for ethanol blends<br />

c<br />

The first figure shown applies to normal emitters; the second applies to high emitters<br />

As was the case with the RFG blends, the two oxygenated blends both reduce<br />

exhaust VOC <strong>and</strong> CO emissions, but increase NOx emissions. The MTBE blend does<br />

not increase non-exhaust VOC emissions, but the ethanol blend does due to the<br />

commonly granted waiver <strong>of</strong> the RVP st<strong>and</strong>ard. Both blends have lower exhaust benzene<br />

<strong>and</strong> 1,3-butadiene emissions. As above, ethanol increases non-exhaust benzene <strong>and</strong><br />

acetaldehyde emissions.<br />

The exhaust emission effects shown above for VOC <strong>and</strong> NOx emissions only<br />

apply to Tier 0 vehicles in our primary analysis. For example, MOBILE6.2 estimates<br />

that 34% <strong>of</strong> exhaust VOC emissions <strong>and</strong> 16% <strong>of</strong> NOx emissions from gasoline vehicles<br />

in 2012 come from Tier 0 vehicles. In the sensitivity analysis, these effects are extended<br />

to all gasoline vehicles. The effect <strong>of</strong> RVP on non-exhaust VOC emissions is<br />

temperature dependent. The figures shown above are based on the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

temperatures occurring across the U.S. in July.<br />

c. Nonroad Equipment<br />

To estimate the effect <strong>of</strong> gasoline quality on emissions from nonroad equipment,<br />

we used EPA’s NONROAD emission model. We used the 2005 version <strong>of</strong> this model,<br />

NONROAD2005, which includes the effect <strong>of</strong> ethanol on permeation emissions from<br />

most nonroad equipment.<br />

Only sulfur <strong>and</strong> oxygen content affect exhaust VOC, CO <strong>and</strong> NOx emissions in<br />

NONROAD. Since sulfur level is assumed to remain constant, the only difference in<br />

exhaust emissions between conventional <strong>and</strong> reformulated gasoline is due to oxygen<br />

- 159 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!