25.10.2013 Views

Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Suggested Frequencies of<br />

Random-number Selections<br />

Random<br />

Tests<br />

Per Year<br />

Frequency of<br />

Randomnumber<br />

Selections<br />

1-11* Quarterly<br />

12-51 Monthly<br />

52-364 Weekly<br />

>364 Daily<br />

* Small systems that conduct few<br />

tests per year may need to conduct<br />

more tests to ensure the testing is<br />

spread throughout the year.<br />

Once an employee is selected, the<br />

employer should schedule the collection<br />

within the testing period (i.e., week, month,<br />

quarter) and make sure the employee is not<br />

inadvertently notified of the test until it is<br />

time to proceed to the collection site. Tests<br />

should be performed evenly throughout the<br />

testing period to eliminate predictability.<br />

If the employee is off-duty or otherwise<br />

unavailable at the time the employer desires<br />

to conduct the test, the test should be<br />

postponed until the employee is on-duty, if<br />

the test can be performed during the testing<br />

period for which the number was selected.<br />

The only explanation for selecting another<br />

number and substituting a replacement for<br />

the original individual is in the rare event the<br />

originally selected employee will not work<br />

(or perform safety-sensitive duties in the<br />

case of an alcohol test) during the entire<br />

testing period. Logistical difficulties,<br />

operational requirements, or complicated<br />

personnel issues that make the testing<br />

process more difficult are not acceptable<br />

reasons for choosing a replacement.<br />

Likewise, convenience of the employer,<br />

collection facility, or mobile testing unit<br />

should not influence whom to test. Anytime<br />

the originally selected employee is not<br />

tested, the employer should document the<br />

reason for not testing and address the<br />

individual’s unavailability during the whole<br />

testing period.<br />

All safety-sensitive employees must be<br />

included in the random pool. Thus, the<br />

random pool should be purged prior to each<br />

testing period to ensure that the random<br />

process will not be compromised. All new<br />

hires and transfers into a safety-sensitive<br />

position since the last draw must be added to<br />

the pool. Similarly, all covered employees<br />

that have retired, quit, are on leave or been<br />

fired, or otherwise expected to be<br />

unavailable throughout the testing period<br />

must be removed from the pool.<br />

If the transit agency decides to randomly<br />

test non-safety-sensitive employees, those<br />

employees must be placed in a separate pool<br />

and tested under the transit agency’s<br />

authority, and not under the authority of the<br />

DOT and FTA.<br />

Once the list of employee identification<br />

numbers has been developed, use it for<br />

random selection. One way to do this is to<br />

contract out the random-number selection<br />

process. Preferably, the contractor<br />

organization would only have the numbers<br />

and would not be able to correlate them with<br />

any employee name. If an outside service<br />

agent is used for this purpose, care must be<br />

taken to ensure that the random-number<br />

draw is communicated to the Designated<br />

Employer Representative in a confidential<br />

manner.<br />

Chapter 6. Types of Testing 6-16 August 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!