25.10.2013 Views

Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

Implementation Guidelines - Federal Transit Administration - U.S. ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5307, 5309, 5311, or 23 U.S.C. 103(e)(4)<br />

comply with this part. The regulation<br />

(§655.82(c)) also requires that each state<br />

certify compliance on behalf of its<br />

subrecipients of these funding programs. In<br />

order to provide the certification, the state<br />

must ensure that each subrecipient is in<br />

compliance with Part 655 and Part 40. If a<br />

subrecipient is not in compliance with the<br />

regulations, the state may suspend its<br />

funding.<br />

FTA does not specify what actions must<br />

be taken by states to ensure subrecipient<br />

compliance, but they are encouraged to<br />

develop an oversight program that provides<br />

a reasonable level of confidence that their<br />

subrecipients are complying before they<br />

certify compliance. Successful oversight<br />

activities include policy review, ongoing<br />

training, technical assistance and<br />

compliance checklists. The Best Practices<br />

manual provides additional information and<br />

examples of monitoring forms and<br />

checklists for state DOTs (Section 4.2 and<br />

Appendix C).<br />

Policy reviews are informative, and<br />

several states evaluate their subrecipient’s<br />

policies to make certain that every system<br />

has a policy in place and that its contents<br />

comply. These states have found the<br />

reviews useful because they often reveal the<br />

nature and extent of a subrecipient’s<br />

compliance problems.<br />

Information sharing and training are also<br />

effective oversight activities. Most states<br />

have provided some level of training for<br />

their subrecipients. A few states have<br />

supplemented their initial training by<br />

providing refresher courses to inform<br />

subrecipients of regulatory changes, new<br />

interpretations, and ways to avoid common<br />

mistakes. Several states have also<br />

developed resource libraries that are<br />

available to subrecipients and have<br />

disseminated information through<br />

newsletters, alerts, emails, and faxes.<br />

Some states have developed monitoring<br />

programs that require subrecipients to<br />

complete comprehensive checklists and<br />

provide documentation showing how they<br />

complied with each regulatory requirement.<br />

A review of the checklists enables the state<br />

to identify problems and require the<br />

subrecipients to take corrective actions.<br />

Other states have included abbreviated<br />

testing program checklists in their ongoing<br />

regulatory compliance review process.<br />

Regardless of the methods used, each<br />

state should be committed to the program<br />

and should take their oversight<br />

responsibilities seriously. Oversight<br />

programs that successfully identify problem<br />

areas and initiate corrective actions will<br />

enhance the integrity of each subrecipient’s<br />

testing program, minimize compliance<br />

issues, avoid potential legal conflicts, and<br />

improve the overall effectiveness of the<br />

program.<br />

Chapter 12. Program Monitoring 12-6 August 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!