26.12.2013 Views

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 Theory<br />

Figure 2.9: Photon flux in backscattering geometry. The photon flux in an infinite<br />

half-space is determined not only by the flux between the first and the last scatterer of<br />

the photon path, A and B, but also by the probabilities f (z A ) and f (z B ) of the photon<br />

to travel between the surface and A or B without being scattered.<br />

obtained <strong>from</strong> the diffusion equation by assuming that the conversion between propagating<br />

light outside the sample and diffusing light inside does not happen at the sample surface, but<br />

at a certain depth inside the sample. The flux density at the sample surface z = 0 is then<br />

j back (⃗r ⊥,A ,⃗r ⊥,B , t) ∝<br />

∫ ∞ ∫ ∞<br />

0 0<br />

f (z A ) · f (z B ) · ρ(A → B, t) 1 surface dz A dz B<br />

where ρ(A → B, t) 1 surface is given by eqn. 2.9. The two functions f (z A ) and f (z B ) represent the<br />

probability distribution of the conversion depth inside the sample. Usually, one assumes nearnormal<br />

incidence and an exponentially decaying conversion probability with decay length l ∗ ,<br />

so that f (z A ) = e − z A<br />

l ∗<br />

and f (z B ) = e − z B<br />

l ∗ cos θ , where the scattering angle θ is the inclination of<br />

the outgoing light wave with respect to the sample surface. d<br />

The photon flux distribution for steady-state experiments is obtained <strong>from</strong> above equation<br />

by integrating over time. For later calculations the case of negligible absorption is especially<br />

important: e<br />

j back (⃗r ⊥,A ,⃗r ⊥,B , θ) ∝<br />

∝<br />

∫ ∞ ∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

0<br />

e − z A<br />

l∗ · e − z B<br />

l ∗ cos θ<br />

(<br />

)<br />

√ 1<br />

− √ 1<br />

(⃗r⊥,B −⃗r ⊥,A ) 2 +(z B −z A ) 2 (⃗r⊥,B −⃗r ⊥,A ) 2 +(z B +2z 0 +z A ) 2<br />

dz A dz B (2.11)<br />

[d] The definition of the scattering angle θ used for backscattering geometry is inconsistent with the definition<br />

used in previous sections. While e.g. Mie theory denotes backscattering with θ = π, the theory of coherent<br />

backscattering uses θ = 0 for the same angle.<br />

[e] As z A and z B are now taken to be positive, z 0 would be negative (see sec. 2.4.1). We simplify the notation by<br />

using |z 0 | and omitting the absolute value bars.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!