Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...
Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...
Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2 Theory<br />
Figure 2.9: Photon flux in backscattering geometry. The photon flux in an infinite<br />
half-space is determined not only by the flux between the first and the last scatterer of<br />
the photon path, A and B, but also by the probabilities f (z A ) and f (z B ) of the photon<br />
to travel between the surface and A or B without being scattered.<br />
obtained <strong>from</strong> the diffusion equation by assuming that the conversion between propagating<br />
light outside the sample and diffusing light inside does not happen at the sample surface, but<br />
at a certain depth inside the sample. The flux density at the sample surface z = 0 is then<br />
j back (⃗r ⊥,A ,⃗r ⊥,B , t) ∝<br />
∫ ∞ ∫ ∞<br />
0 0<br />
f (z A ) · f (z B ) · ρ(A → B, t) 1 surface dz A dz B<br />
where ρ(A → B, t) 1 surface is given by eqn. 2.9. The two functions f (z A ) and f (z B ) represent the<br />
probability distribution of the conversion depth inside the sample. Usually, one assumes nearnormal<br />
incidence and an exponentially decaying conversion probability with decay length l ∗ ,<br />
so that f (z A ) = e − z A<br />
l ∗<br />
and f (z B ) = e − z B<br />
l ∗ cos θ , where the scattering angle θ is the inclination of<br />
the outgoing light wave with respect to the sample surface. d<br />
The photon flux distribution for steady-state experiments is obtained <strong>from</strong> above equation<br />
by integrating over time. For later calculations the case of negligible absorption is especially<br />
important: e<br />
j back (⃗r ⊥,A ,⃗r ⊥,B , θ) ∝<br />
∝<br />
∫ ∞ ∫ ∞<br />
0<br />
0<br />
e − z A<br />
l∗ · e − z B<br />
l ∗ cos θ<br />
(<br />
)<br />
√ 1<br />
− √ 1<br />
(⃗r⊥,B −⃗r ⊥,A ) 2 +(z B −z A ) 2 (⃗r⊥,B −⃗r ⊥,A ) 2 +(z B +2z 0 +z A ) 2<br />
dz A dz B (2.11)<br />
[d] The definition of the scattering angle θ used for backscattering geometry is inconsistent with the definition<br />
used in previous sections. While e.g. Mie theory denotes backscattering with θ = π, the theory of coherent<br />
backscattering uses θ = 0 for the same angle.<br />
[e] As z A and z B are now taken to be positive, z 0 would be negative (see sec. 2.4.1). We simplify the notation by<br />
using |z 0 | and omitting the absolute value bars.<br />
16