26.12.2013 Views

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.1 Conservation of energy in coherent backscattering<br />

the photodiodes. For such samples, the angular distribution of the backscattered intensity is<br />

known to be proportional to the diffuson α d (θ) given in eqn. 2.14, as any deviations <strong>from</strong> the<br />

incoherent background (i.e. the backscattering cone and the energy cutback) are too narrow<br />

or too small to be detected by the setup.<br />

The backscattering of the reference is also proportional to the incoming laser power P and<br />

the total fraction of the backscattered intensity, the albedo A. The latter is reduced by energy<br />

losses in the sample, mostly due to absorption of photonic energy, but also because of photon<br />

leakage at the side and the rear surfaces.<br />

For the calibration of the photodiodes only a relative power scale is needed, as one is merely<br />

interested in compensating different gains of the diodes and their electronics. Therefore the<br />

exact value of the albedo is not important, as long as it is independent of the inserted light<br />

power. If however the albedos are known for sample and reference, one can derive an absolute<br />

power scale for the diode signals.<br />

Herein lies the misapprehension of [22, 23, 47], where the reference sample was also used to<br />

determine the intensity level of the diffuson. As the different albedos of sample and reference<br />

were neglected, this approach confuses relative and absolute power scale and therefore yields<br />

slightly wrong results.<br />

The photodiodes are calibrated by a series of measurements of the diode signals d θ at different<br />

incoming light powers P, so that a relation between the diode signals and the light power<br />

scattered in a certain direction θ can be derived. Previously used were relations like d θ ∝<br />

α d (θ) · P [19], d θ ∝ cos θ · P, or even simply d θ ∝ P [22, 23, 47]. The latter however distort both<br />

diffuson and cooperon for angles θ > 0, so that they can be used only if the backscattering<br />

cone is comparatively narrow.<br />

The effect of the different albedos of sample and reference can be incorporated in the calibration<br />

function by the albedo mismatch b ℵ = A reference /A sample :<br />

d θ ∝ α d (θ) · ℵ · P (5.2)<br />

The albedo mismatch rescales the emitted intensity of the reference, so that the backscattering<br />

of reference and sample is directly comparable.<br />

The precision of the experimental result is determined by the precision of the reference measurements.<br />

The order of the fitted polynomial must therefore be chosen such that the errors<br />

are not artificially reduced. Based on the observations on fig. 5.1 we use 3rd order polynomials<br />

to fit the data and obtain the calibration functions for the photodiodes.<br />

5.1.2 Calculating the albedo<br />

The albedo A of a multiple scattering sample is defined as the ratio of the (back-)scattered<br />

light power P out and the inserted power P in . The albedo of a sample without any losses would<br />

[b] ℵ = hebr. aleph<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!