26.12.2013 Views

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.6 On polarization and interference<br />

2.5.2 Transmission geometry<br />

While the samples for backscattering experiments are usually thick, transmission experiments<br />

require rather thin samples, which resemble an infinite slab of thickness L. Still, if the samples<br />

are not too thin, transmission experiments can be fully described by diffusion as all photon<br />

paths have at least the length of the sample thickness.<br />

As a consequence, the exact depth of the conversion between plane wave and diffusive transport<br />

plays only a subordinate role. One can therefore assume that the conversion happens at<br />

a single depth l ∗ .<br />

An important experimental quantity is the distribution of photon flight times (which is equivalent<br />

to the path length distribution) of the transmitted light<br />

∫<br />

j trans (t) ∝<br />

rear surface<br />

δ (z A − l ∗ ) · δ ( z B − (L ′ −l ∗ ) ) · ρ(A → B, t) 2 surfaces d⃗r ⊥ =<br />

= e− τ<br />

t ∞<br />

√<br />

4πDt<br />

∑ e − (2mL′ +(L ′ −l ∗ )−l ∗ ) 2<br />

4Dt − e − (2mL′ −(L ′ −l ∗ )−l ∗ ) 2<br />

4Dt<br />

m=−∞<br />

Using Poisson’s sum formula ∑ ∞ n=−∞ f (n) = ∑ ∞ m=−∞<br />

∫ ∞<br />

−∞ e−2πima f (a) da this can be turned<br />

into [38]<br />

j trans (t) ∝ 2e− τ<br />

t ∞ (<br />

L ∑ ′ e − n2 π 2<br />

L ′2 Dt nπ<br />

( nπ<br />

)<br />

sin<br />

L<br />

n=1<br />

′ l∗) sin<br />

L ′ (L′ − l ∗ )<br />

Obviously, it is l∗<br />

L<br />

′ 0, so that the sine can be replaced by its argument. Likewise, it is<br />

1. Here we can replace the sine by (−1)<br />

n+1 nπ<br />

l ∗ , yielding<br />

L ′ −l ∗<br />

L ′<br />

j trans (t) ∝ −2e − t τ<br />

∞<br />

∑<br />

n=1<br />

( (−1) n e − n2 π 2<br />

L ′2 Dt nπ<br />

L ′<br />

) 2 l<br />

∗2<br />

L ′ L ′ (2.12)<br />

2.6 On polarization and interference<br />

With the introduction of the models ‘random walk’ and ‘diffusion’ an important property<br />

of the scattered light has been lost: Despite of the vectorial nature of electromagnetic waves<br />

both models describe the scattering of scalar waves. To find a correct description of multiple<br />

scattering of vector waves we have to go back to single scattering once more.<br />

Fig. 2.3 shows that the polarization of light scattered by a spherical particle depends strongly<br />

on the scattering angle and the polarization of the incoming wave with respect to the scattering<br />

plane. The result is that after a few scattering events in a multiple scattering sample the<br />

photons will have completely lost the memory of their initial polarization. Multiply scattered<br />

light is therefore unpolarized.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!