26.12.2013 Views

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

Coherent Backscattering from Multiple Scattering Systems - KOPS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5 Experiments<br />

As it seems to be the most well-founded value, all further evaluations were performed with<br />

the diffusion coefficient obtained <strong>from</strong> the small angle experiments, D = 13300 m2 /s. On good<br />

data sets with E ≈ 0 one can then observe the anticipated intensity cutback at the wings of the<br />

backscattering cone which balances the intensity enhancement of the cone (fig. 5.7). Especially<br />

for small kl ∗ the measured data therefore deviate considerably <strong>from</strong> α (A)<br />

c , which earlier was<br />

used to fit the backscattering data [22, 23, 47]. In contrast, the agreement with α (A)<br />

c + α (B+C)<br />

c is<br />

nearly perfect, except for a slight drop in the measured data at scattering angles close to 90 ◦ ,<br />

which however suspiciously looks as if it was caused by some technical problem in the setup.<br />

These findings confirm that the improved theory developed by E. Akkermans and G. Montambaux<br />

can indeed be applied to describe coherent backscattering, and conversely allow to<br />

judge the experimental data not only by conservation of energy, but also by their agreement<br />

with the theoretical curve. A combination of both criteria should hereby yield the best results,<br />

as good agreement with the theory can also be found for E that deviate somewhat <strong>from</strong> zero,<br />

and on the other hand even a few measurements with E ≈ 0 deviate <strong>from</strong> the theory (fig. 5.8).<br />

5.2 The coherent backscattering cone in high resolution<br />

The high resolution backscattering setup introduced in sec. 3.3 was developed as a possible<br />

means to investigate Anderson localization. The photons that are trapped on closed loops<br />

in the photon paths not only lead to a different path length distribution in time-resolved<br />

transmission experiments, but also change the shape of the coherent backscattering cone. This<br />

is because localization strongly reduces the number of photons emerging <strong>from</strong> long photon<br />

paths, which leads to a rounding of the tip of the backscattering cone similar to that caused<br />

by absorption (see sec. 2.7). At the same time the setup was built as a means to measure the<br />

transport mean free path of samples with high kl ∗ and consequently extremely narrow cones,<br />

which of course have other applications than the search for Anderson localization.<br />

5.2.1 Tip rounding of the coherent backscattering cone<br />

In time of flight experiments the titania powder R700 has shown an onset of localization<br />

[5, 6, 48], so that it was our first choice to test if the small angle setup is applicable in the<br />

search for Anderson localization. If the setup is indeed able to resolve the effect of localization,<br />

the measured rounding of the cone tip will deviate <strong>from</strong> the theoretical prediction for pure<br />

absorption given in eqn. 2.18. If on the other hand the rounding due to localization can not be<br />

observed, this is a strong indication that the concept of the small angle setup is not suitable to<br />

detect localization effects.<br />

To evaluate the small angle backscattering data of R700, the procedure proposed in sec. 3.3<br />

has to be altered a little: The backscattering cone of the titania powder is too wide to directly<br />

find the backscattering direction – the white region in the binary image is too frayed as that<br />

the center of mass could reliably identify the tip of the backscattering cone. Instead, the<br />

backscattering direction is derived <strong>from</strong> a teflon reference measurement, where the conetip<br />

can be found quite precisely (fig. 5.9). As the direction θ = 0 is determined only by the<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!