22.02.2014 Views

Naylor Road Metro Station Area Access and Capacity - WMATA.com.

Naylor Road Metro Station Area Access and Capacity - WMATA.com.

Naylor Road Metro Station Area Access and Capacity - WMATA.com.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

With the transformation of the <strong>Naylor</strong> <strong>Road</strong><br />

<strong>Station</strong> area from an automobile-oriented<br />

transit center to a regional center of mixed-use<br />

TOD, how people access the station will change<br />

by 2040 (Table ES-2). The model estimates that<br />

walk <strong>and</strong> bike access will grow significantly,<br />

owing to the expected concentration of<br />

mixed-use buildings at the station in the<br />

future. While the model estimates a decline in<br />

automobile access as a percent of daily mode<br />

share, Park & Ride usage will remain high.<br />

This study assumed that bus ridership will<br />

grow similarly to <strong>Naylor</strong> <strong>Road</strong> <strong>Station</strong>’s total entries (35 percent during peak periods <strong>and</strong> eight<br />

percent during off-peak periods) to ensure that adequate bus capacity is considered in future<br />

redevelopment. Finally, this study assumes that planning for up to three shuttle trips per hour<br />

during peak periods in 2040 is a reasonable, conservative assumption given the available data.<br />

Future <strong>Station</strong> <strong>Access</strong> Needs<br />

Realizing <strong>Naylor</strong> <strong>Road</strong> <strong>Station</strong>’s TOD vision will take years, <strong>and</strong> this redevelopment process is<br />

just now beginning through <strong>com</strong>pleted or in-process planning studies tasked with improving<br />

the station area <strong>and</strong> its multimodal access. This report uses information <strong>and</strong> findings from these<br />

studies as well as additional station observations <strong>and</strong> analyses performed specifically for this<br />

study to define station access deficiencies <strong>and</strong> opportunities for improvement—or more simply,<br />

station access “needs.”<br />

In addition, the study evaluated station capacity based on 2012 <strong>and</strong> estimated 2040 ridership<br />

levels. Table ES-3 shows that existing platform-to-mezzanine elevator capacity does not meet<br />

established st<strong>and</strong>ards, but that all other circulation<br />

elements at the existing mezzanine meet the minimum<br />

requirements for 2012 <strong>and</strong> estimated 2040 passenger loads.<br />

Circulation<br />

Element<br />

Existing<br />

This study also analyzed <strong>Naylor</strong> <strong>Road</strong> <strong>Station</strong>’s emergency<br />

egress capacity under existing conditions as well as<br />

estimated conditions in 2040 (Table ES-4). This analysis is<br />

based on the requirements set by the NFPA 130 st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

Evacuation time analysis is based on a worst-case-scenario<br />

with peak-direction trains containing twice the typical<br />

number of passengers to simulate a missed headway.<br />

<strong>Metro</strong> uses these guidelines as design goals when<br />

modifying station facilities to increase their emergency<br />

safety capabilities. The analysis results show that <strong>Naylor</strong><br />

<strong>Road</strong> <strong>Station</strong> presently does not meet emergency egress<br />

requirements for the afternoon peak period. However, as a<br />

result of shorter headways by 2040, the station is expected<br />

to meet all emergency egress st<strong>and</strong>ards in the future.<br />

Table ES-2: 2040 Estimated Weekday Mode Share for <strong>Naylor</strong><br />

<strong>Road</strong> <strong>Station</strong><br />

Period<br />

Park &<br />

Ride<br />

Kiss &<br />

Ride Bus<br />

Walk/<br />

Bike Total<br />

Weekday Mode Share Change from 2012 to 2040*<br />

Peak Periods -3% -49% 35% 39% 35%<br />

Off-Peak Periods 167% -75% 8% 294% 8%<br />

All day 12% -56% 30% 92% 27%<br />

Weekday Mode Share<br />

2012 23% 12% 46% 19% 100%<br />

2040 20% 4% 47% 29% 100%<br />

* Rounded to the nearest whole number<br />

Table ES-3: <strong>Station</strong> <strong>Capacity</strong> Analysis Results<br />

Elements Required<br />

2012 2040<br />

Platform Escalators 2 2 2<br />

Platform Elevators* 1 2 2<br />

Faregate Aisles 4 2 2<br />

Farecard Vendors 7 1 1<br />

* While only one platform elevator per mezzanine is required<br />

for ADA <strong>com</strong>pliance, current practice by <strong>Metro</strong> is to provide two<br />

platform elevators per mezzanine.<br />

Table ES-4: Future Emergency Egress<br />

NFPA<br />

Measure (minutes)<br />

Morning Peak<br />

Time to clear platform<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

4.0<br />

2012<br />

3.6<br />

2040<br />

2.5<br />

Time to point of safety 6.0 5.1 4.0<br />

Afternoon Peak<br />

Time to clear platform 4.0 5.2 3.4<br />

Time to point of safety 6.0 6.7 4.9<br />

ES-5 | Executive Summary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!