13.09.2014 Views

Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada

Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada

Keith Vodden Dr. Douglas Smith - Transports Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix A—Detail on Calculations of the Ontario Model<br />

Exhibit A-8<br />

Probabilities of Total and Partial Permanent Disability by<br />

Injury Severity<br />

Incidence of permanent<br />

disability<br />

Total Partial<br />

Injuries:<br />

Major 0.0162 0.1493<br />

Minor 0.0006 0.0115<br />

Minimal 0.0003 0.0058<br />

Source: Databook on Nonfatal Injury: Incidence, Costs and Consequences by Ted R. Miller, Nancy M.<br />

Pindus, John B. <strong>Douglas</strong>s, Shelli B. Rossman, May 1995:<br />

Using these probabilities we estimate the number of total and partial permanent<br />

disabilities by severity of injury and collision severity. Results for 2004 are provided in<br />

Exhibit A-9. Note that the exhibit identifies fractional total disabilities within a year. In<br />

the case of 0.3 total disabilities from minimal injuries under the fatal category this should<br />

be interpreted as one total disability approximately each three years (1 injury/0.3 injury<br />

per year =3.3 years).<br />

2. Number of activity-days and work-days lost<br />

We estimate the days of lost activity from motor vehicle collisions from data from<br />

the Passenger Car Survey (PCS) of Transport <strong>Canada</strong>. The data are for the period 1984<br />

to 1989 inclusive for all of <strong>Canada</strong> and measure days of work lost including those days<br />

lost by persons engaged in household work. The PSC was discontinued in the early<br />

1990s. Data discussed in this section was originally used in our 1994 study. More detail<br />

on the survey methods can be found in this earlier report.<br />

Our estimates of average days lost differ depending on whether the analysis is for<br />

our DFE or WTP analysis. This is as a result of the underlying rationale of the DFE and<br />

WTP approaches.<br />

TNS Canadian Facts, Social and Policy Research 129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!