24.10.2014 Views

Dissertation - HQ

Dissertation - HQ

Dissertation - HQ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98 Vertical distribution during ontogeny<br />

z cm allows the use<br />

standard techniques<br />

Varying depth bins<br />

increases resolution<br />

range sampled by each net, in meters, and 1 is a dimensionalisation<br />

constant in m 2 .<br />

Using the z cm as a summary for vertical distributions in further<br />

analyses is appropriate because its definition stems from the patchiness<br />

of the data and it is not overly sensible to large variations in captures.<br />

Indeed, nets with large captures influence the computation of the z cm<br />

itself, but, after that, this particular z cm is not given more weight than<br />

z cms computed at other stations, where captures are lower. Indeed, a<br />

station with important captures only represents one observation of one<br />

larval patch; a dense patch certainly, but still only one. Having a unique<br />

numerical descriptor for each observation makes it possible to use all<br />

the standard statistical tools. The last characteristic of stratified data<br />

that should be acknowledged is the fact that z cms are bounded at the<br />

surface and possibly at depth. Therefore the distribution of z cms is likely<br />

to be non-normal. The gamma distribution, which is bounded at zero,<br />

may be used for parametric approaches.<br />

The z cm is computed from means of the depth ranges sampled by<br />

each net (z i). For example, all organisms sampled by a net from 100 m<br />

to 50 m depth are treated as if they have been captured at 75 m. If those<br />

depth ranges are the same at each station, which, to our knowledge,<br />

is the case in all studies where the bottom was not limiting or was<br />

uniform, then the z cms are computed as means of the same numbers.<br />

The result is therefore biased toward those numbers. Furthermore, if<br />

certain organisms are concentrated within a thin layer that is always<br />

completely sampled by one net, their depth will always be estimated as<br />

the mean of this particular net, which is likely to be different from their<br />

actual depth. In the example above, organisms located between 95 m<br />

and 85 m would systematically be shifted to 75 m. These limitations<br />

disappear if the depths intervals are randomised, or at least varied,<br />

between stations. Such a sampling strategy prevents the use of the<br />

techniques based on distributions (section 5.2.1) and complicates the<br />

comparison of two given stations, because depths bins are not the same.<br />

However, with enough replicates, it enhances the vertical resolution in<br />

a z cm approach.<br />

Dispersion around the mean<br />

Weighted variance<br />

Descriptive statistics that accompany the computation of the mean can<br />

be used to depict the spread of the patch. The formula for the variance<br />

is 209 P<br />

s 2 (xi − ¯x) 2<br />

=<br />

(5.3)<br />

n − 1<br />

where x i are the observations, ¯x is the mean, and n is the sample size.<br />

With the weights added, and in particular for the z cm, it becomes<br />

P ai(z<br />

s 2 i − ¯z w) 2<br />

w =<br />

(n ′ − 1) ( P a i/n ′ )<br />

(5.4)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!