Dissertation - HQ
Dissertation - HQ
Dissertation - HQ
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
98 Vertical distribution during ontogeny<br />
z cm allows the use<br />
standard techniques<br />
Varying depth bins<br />
increases resolution<br />
range sampled by each net, in meters, and 1 is a dimensionalisation<br />
constant in m 2 .<br />
Using the z cm as a summary for vertical distributions in further<br />
analyses is appropriate because its definition stems from the patchiness<br />
of the data and it is not overly sensible to large variations in captures.<br />
Indeed, nets with large captures influence the computation of the z cm<br />
itself, but, after that, this particular z cm is not given more weight than<br />
z cms computed at other stations, where captures are lower. Indeed, a<br />
station with important captures only represents one observation of one<br />
larval patch; a dense patch certainly, but still only one. Having a unique<br />
numerical descriptor for each observation makes it possible to use all<br />
the standard statistical tools. The last characteristic of stratified data<br />
that should be acknowledged is the fact that z cms are bounded at the<br />
surface and possibly at depth. Therefore the distribution of z cms is likely<br />
to be non-normal. The gamma distribution, which is bounded at zero,<br />
may be used for parametric approaches.<br />
The z cm is computed from means of the depth ranges sampled by<br />
each net (z i). For example, all organisms sampled by a net from 100 m<br />
to 50 m depth are treated as if they have been captured at 75 m. If those<br />
depth ranges are the same at each station, which, to our knowledge,<br />
is the case in all studies where the bottom was not limiting or was<br />
uniform, then the z cms are computed as means of the same numbers.<br />
The result is therefore biased toward those numbers. Furthermore, if<br />
certain organisms are concentrated within a thin layer that is always<br />
completely sampled by one net, their depth will always be estimated as<br />
the mean of this particular net, which is likely to be different from their<br />
actual depth. In the example above, organisms located between 95 m<br />
and 85 m would systematically be shifted to 75 m. These limitations<br />
disappear if the depths intervals are randomised, or at least varied,<br />
between stations. Such a sampling strategy prevents the use of the<br />
techniques based on distributions (section 5.2.1) and complicates the<br />
comparison of two given stations, because depths bins are not the same.<br />
However, with enough replicates, it enhances the vertical resolution in<br />
a z cm approach.<br />
Dispersion around the mean<br />
Weighted variance<br />
Descriptive statistics that accompany the computation of the mean can<br />
be used to depict the spread of the patch. The formula for the variance<br />
is 209 P<br />
s 2 (xi − ¯x) 2<br />
=<br />
(5.3)<br />
n − 1<br />
where x i are the observations, ¯x is the mean, and n is the sample size.<br />
With the weights added, and in particular for the z cm, it becomes<br />
P ai(z<br />
s 2 i − ¯z w) 2<br />
w =<br />
(n ′ − 1) ( P a i/n ′ )<br />
(5.4)