Dissertation - HQ
Dissertation - HQ
Dissertation - HQ
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
150 Oceanography vs. behaviour<br />
controls increase significantly: from 140 · 170 · 3 · 6 = 176,400 to<br />
300 · 160 · 5 = 240,000 for the state and from seven to hundreds for<br />
controls. On the other hand, stochasticity sources are removed: there<br />
is no explicit energy budget anymore, so no feeding, and survival is<br />
not represented (i.e. is considered homogenous spatially). So the use of<br />
transition matrices is inappropriate because they would be very large<br />
but only one final state would be reachable from any given initial state<br />
Loops instead of and decision. Therefore, gain is computed at each state inside a loop,<br />
matrix computation and transition matrices are never built. The loop is coded in Fortran 90<br />
and compile time vectorisation (using Intel Fortran Compiler) as well<br />
as local parallelisation (through OpenMP) accelerate the process. The<br />
extraction/interpolation of current speeds and computation of optimal<br />
decisions takes between one and two hours for the set of parameters<br />
specified above, on a cluster node with four 2.33 GHz double core CPUs.<br />
Both optimal decision and end points after advection are stored in a<br />
NetCDF file, so the advection does not have to be done again for the<br />
forward computation of trajectories. Computing trajectories is therefore<br />
virtually instantaneous and can be done in an interpreted language (R<br />
in this case).<br />
6.4.4 Large impact of swimming<br />
Swimming<br />
greatly enhances<br />
self-recruitment<br />
First, the impact of swimming is assessed by comparing trajectories of<br />
passive and active larvae in the same situation (identical release sites and<br />
date, same PLD). Figures 6.15 and 6.16 highlight the tremendous impact<br />
of swimming, even for slow swimming larvae, in both configurations<br />
used here. When larvae are treated as passive particles, most of them<br />
are advected away from their release location. In the island case, passive<br />
retention in regions of weak flow is almost never sufficient to retain<br />
particles for the whole larval phase. In the promontory case, where<br />
backward flow is more stable behind the cape, a small percentage of<br />
larvae can be passively retained and self-recruit. These are just five<br />
or ten trajectories, in one flow situation, but they are representative<br />
of the overall magnitude of the impact of swimming. The effect is<br />
estimated quantitatively by computing the percentage of recruiting (i.e.<br />
self-recruiting) larvae starting from the promontory or the island at<br />
three release dates (Table 6.2). In all cases, self-recruitment is quasiimpossible<br />
for passive particles but swimming shifts the regime to a<br />
situation where most larvae can self-recruit.<br />
Table 6.2 Mean percentage of successful trajectories for the coral reef fish P.<br />
amboinensis and a temperate fish, in the island and promontory configurations.<br />
Coral-Reef Temperate<br />
passive active passive active<br />
Island 0 95 0 45<br />
Promontory 2 95 1 72