Dissertation - HQ
Dissertation - HQ
Dissertation - HQ
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
30 Behaviour in models<br />
1.3 Vertical position<br />
1.3.1 Potential influences<br />
Vertical heterogeneity<br />
in physical variables<br />
The unknown effect<br />
of boundary layers<br />
Any vertical heterogeneity in the current field will interact with the<br />
vertical distribution of larvae to indirectly influence their dispersal, as<br />
demonstrated by modelling 69,70 and empirical 71 studies. And of course,<br />
many things in addition to current velocity vary vertically in the ocean<br />
(temperature, light, food concentrations, etc.). Temperature influences<br />
pelagic phase duration 72 , development rates 73 , and swimming speed 25 .<br />
Food resources are often greater near the thermocline and fish larvae<br />
may accumulate at these depths 74–76 . Conversely, they might use diel<br />
vertical migration to avoid predation near the surface 77 . Larvae may use<br />
sun angle or sound for orientation, so the vertical position of a larva<br />
relative to the surface (sun angle detection) or the thermocline (hearing)<br />
may influence its ability to detect these cues and orient. Overall, the<br />
vertical position of larvae can therefore influence their feeding success,<br />
predation risk, growth, swimming ability, and ability to detect sensory<br />
cues, all of which can influence their trajectories 78 . Of all behaviours,<br />
vertical positionning is the most widely recognised as being influential<br />
and the one most often incorporated into biophysical models.<br />
Furthermore, in coastal waters, larvae may occupy the epibenthic<br />
boundary layer, where current velocity can differ substantially from<br />
that in the water column. Unfortunately, information on the occurrence<br />
of fish larvae in such epibenthic locations is limited because it is very<br />
hard to sample, especially in deep water or where the bottom is very<br />
irregular or hard. Occupancy of the boundary layer not only places the<br />
larvae in a different current regime, but it may also shift their food<br />
regime and expose them to increased risk of predation from benthic<br />
predators. Given the important effect boundary layers potentially have,<br />
further investigation is suited.<br />
1.3.2 When to include this behaviour?<br />
Vertical behaviour<br />
should always<br />
be included<br />
Current velocity, hydrography (e.g. salinity, temperature), and fluorometry<br />
profiles (or their modelled equivalents) over the spatial scale and<br />
depth range where larval fishes occur are required in order to evaluate<br />
the degree of vertical shear in the current, the temperature gradient, and<br />
the depth of chlorophyll maximum. Clearly, if substantial heterogeneity<br />
in the velocity field is detected, vertical distribution of larvae must be<br />
included in a model. Some models integrate water movement over the<br />
surface Ekman Layer, while, in this layer, water velocity often differs<br />
with depth. This means that larvae at different depths within the Ekman<br />
Layer will be subject to different current speeds and directions, and<br />
the model should reflect this and avoid averaging over depth. If some<br />
modelled features (such as survival or growth) explicitly depend on<br />
food availability or temperature and these are not homogeneous on the