24.10.2014 Views

Dissertation - HQ

Dissertation - HQ

Dissertation - HQ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30 Behaviour in models<br />

1.3 Vertical position<br />

1.3.1 Potential influences<br />

Vertical heterogeneity<br />

in physical variables<br />

The unknown effect<br />

of boundary layers<br />

Any vertical heterogeneity in the current field will interact with the<br />

vertical distribution of larvae to indirectly influence their dispersal, as<br />

demonstrated by modelling 69,70 and empirical 71 studies. And of course,<br />

many things in addition to current velocity vary vertically in the ocean<br />

(temperature, light, food concentrations, etc.). Temperature influences<br />

pelagic phase duration 72 , development rates 73 , and swimming speed 25 .<br />

Food resources are often greater near the thermocline and fish larvae<br />

may accumulate at these depths 74–76 . Conversely, they might use diel<br />

vertical migration to avoid predation near the surface 77 . Larvae may use<br />

sun angle or sound for orientation, so the vertical position of a larva<br />

relative to the surface (sun angle detection) or the thermocline (hearing)<br />

may influence its ability to detect these cues and orient. Overall, the<br />

vertical position of larvae can therefore influence their feeding success,<br />

predation risk, growth, swimming ability, and ability to detect sensory<br />

cues, all of which can influence their trajectories 78 . Of all behaviours,<br />

vertical positionning is the most widely recognised as being influential<br />

and the one most often incorporated into biophysical models.<br />

Furthermore, in coastal waters, larvae may occupy the epibenthic<br />

boundary layer, where current velocity can differ substantially from<br />

that in the water column. Unfortunately, information on the occurrence<br />

of fish larvae in such epibenthic locations is limited because it is very<br />

hard to sample, especially in deep water or where the bottom is very<br />

irregular or hard. Occupancy of the boundary layer not only places the<br />

larvae in a different current regime, but it may also shift their food<br />

regime and expose them to increased risk of predation from benthic<br />

predators. Given the important effect boundary layers potentially have,<br />

further investigation is suited.<br />

1.3.2 When to include this behaviour?<br />

Vertical behaviour<br />

should always<br />

be included<br />

Current velocity, hydrography (e.g. salinity, temperature), and fluorometry<br />

profiles (or their modelled equivalents) over the spatial scale and<br />

depth range where larval fishes occur are required in order to evaluate<br />

the degree of vertical shear in the current, the temperature gradient, and<br />

the depth of chlorophyll maximum. Clearly, if substantial heterogeneity<br />

in the velocity field is detected, vertical distribution of larvae must be<br />

included in a model. Some models integrate water movement over the<br />

surface Ekman Layer, while, in this layer, water velocity often differs<br />

with depth. This means that larvae at different depths within the Ekman<br />

Layer will be subject to different current speeds and directions, and<br />

the model should reflect this and avoid averaging over depth. If some<br />

modelled features (such as survival or growth) explicitly depend on<br />

food availability or temperature and these are not homogeneous on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!