28.10.2014 Views

Fault Detection and Diagnostics for Rooftop Air Conditioners

Fault Detection and Diagnostics for Rooftop Air Conditioners

Fault Detection and Diagnostics for Rooftop Air Conditioners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36<br />

2.2.1.1 Normal Operation Data<br />

The normal operation data set was obtained at a number of controlled normal<br />

operating conditions. There are two sets of normal operation data. A large set of data was<br />

gathered at combinations of indoor dry bulb temperatures ( T ra<br />

) of 70, 73, 76, 79, <strong>and</strong> 82<br />

F, indoor wet bulb temperatures ( T<br />

wb<br />

) of 33, 38, 61, 64, <strong>and</strong> 67 F, <strong>and</strong> ambient<br />

temperatures ( T amb<br />

) of 60, 70, 80, 90, <strong>and</strong> 100 F. A smaller set of data was gathered at<br />

indoor dry bulb temperatures of 71.3, 74.3, 77.3, <strong>and</strong> 80.3 F, indoor wet bulb<br />

temperatures of 36.3, 39.3, 62.3, <strong>and</strong> 63.3 F, <strong>and</strong> ambient temperatures of 63, 73, 83, <strong>and</strong><br />

93 F. The conditions were selected because they completely cover the normal com<strong>for</strong>t<br />

region defined by ASHRAE (1993).<br />

To ensure that there were no faults developing in the test unit during the test<br />

period <strong>and</strong> to quantify experimental noise which is present in the operation of the test unit,<br />

a test condition at T amb<br />

= 83 F, T ra<br />

= 76 F, T wb<br />

= 61 F was retested every few days. The<br />

results of this repeatability test <strong>for</strong> all of the measurements used by the FDD technique<br />

are shown in Table 2-1. Because of the smaller heat capacity associated with vapor (as<br />

compared with liquid), the noisiest measurements are the suction superheat <strong>and</strong> hot gas<br />

temperatures.<br />

Table 2-1 Repeatability analysis during steady-state model testing<br />

Data<br />

(deg. F)<br />

Tevap<br />

Tsh<br />

Tdis<br />

Tcond<br />

Tsc<br />

∆Tca<br />

∆Tea<br />

Mean 43.76 8.42 193.11 108.69 7.03 11.72 19.14<br />

Std. Dev. 0.39 1.73 1.23 0.40 0.23 0.09 0.17<br />

Spread 1.21 4.80 4.04 1.28 0.60 0.26 0.64<br />

2.2.1.2 <strong>Fault</strong>y Operation Data<br />

In addition, five types of artificial faults were introduced at different fault levels<br />

<strong>and</strong> the unit was tested at different load levels in order to evaluate the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the<br />

FDD technique.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!