28.10.2014 Views

Fault Detection and Diagnostics for Rooftop Air Conditioners

Fault Detection and Diagnostics for Rooftop Air Conditioners

Fault Detection and Diagnostics for Rooftop Air Conditioners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

efficiency <strong>and</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>for</strong> the simulated data that he studied. These methods,<br />

however, have not been compared using real operating data. Breuker (1997) compared the<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance of the methods using actual transient data recorded <strong>for</strong> the FDD<br />

demonstration shown in figure 4.8.<br />

Each of the methods has design parameters that affect its per<strong>for</strong>mance. For the slope <strong>and</strong><br />

variance methods based on measurements in a fixed-length sliding window of recent<br />

values, the number of measurements in the fixed-length window, the frequency with which<br />

new measurements are taken, <strong>and</strong> the steady-state detector threshold are the design<br />

parameters. Instead of using a fixed window length, the exponentially weighted variance<br />

method uses a <strong>for</strong>getting factor to reduce the contribution of successively older<br />

measurements on the variance calculated at each step.<br />

In order to compare the per<strong>for</strong>mance of the three methods, each was applied to a transient<br />

start-up profile <strong>for</strong> hot gas temperature from a rooftop air conditioning unit. This analysis<br />

used a fixed window length of 10 measurements <strong>and</strong> a <strong>for</strong>getting factor of 0.7 with<br />

measurements being taken from the test unit every 5 seconds. The <strong>for</strong>getting factor of 0.7<br />

was chosen to give similar outputs between the variance calculated from the sliding<br />

window <strong>and</strong> the exponentially weighted variance. The first observation which can be made<br />

about the slope method with the two variance methods is that the slope can assume both<br />

positive <strong>and</strong> negative values, while the variance is only positive. This could lead to a<br />

problem with the slope method, since an overshoot could be interpreted as steady-state<br />

operation. For this reason, the methods which utilize variance rather than slope are more<br />

reliable. Figure 4.8 shows that the two methods which utilize variance as an indicator of<br />

steady-state operation have almost identical outputs during their transient startup. Since<br />

the exponentially weighted method is more computationally efficient than the fixedwindow<br />

method, this method was selected <strong>for</strong> further study.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!