28.10.2014 Views

Fault Detection and Diagnostics for Rooftop Air Conditioners

Fault Detection and Diagnostics for Rooftop Air Conditioners

Fault Detection and Diagnostics for Rooftop Air Conditioners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

79<br />

Figure 4-26 Histogram bar plot of the normalized fault indicator <strong>for</strong> compressor valve<br />

leakage<br />

In summary, the system has three faults, low refrigerant charge, liquid line<br />

restriction <strong>and</strong> condenser fouling. To assess the impact of the diagnosed faults on the<br />

overall system per<strong>for</strong>mance, Figure 4-27 plots the cooling capacity degradation. It can be<br />

seen that the system cooling capacity was degraded 23~45% <strong>and</strong> the average is about<br />

32%, which is coincident with the value indicated by refrigerant charge fault indicator.<br />

The cooling capacity degradation can be confirmed by investigating the return air<br />

temperature <strong>and</strong> system running time. It can be seen from Figure 4-28 that the average<br />

return air temperature is around 78 F <strong>and</strong> the highest is 88 F, which does not satisfy the<br />

com<strong>for</strong>t criteria. From Figure 4-29, it can be seen that the system kept running<br />

continuously <strong>for</strong> a long time (average is 2.5 hours <strong>and</strong> maximum is up to 9 hours) in<br />

order to remove the heat load. So, from the com<strong>for</strong>t criteria, service should be done to<br />

correct the diagnosed faults in order to maintain com<strong>for</strong>t.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!