07.11.2014 Views

agrl_innovations_in_ssa.pdf?utm_content=buffercb41d&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

agrl_innovations_in_ssa.pdf?utm_content=buffercb41d&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

agrl_innovations_in_ssa.pdf?utm_content=buffercb41d&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Purpose and methodologies used<br />

This review seeks to draw on the experiences of multiple stakeholder agricultural <strong>in</strong>novation<br />

approaches <strong>in</strong> the context of IAR4D <strong>in</strong> guid<strong>in</strong>g a research agenda, subsequent knowledge<br />

generation and its use <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g food security and nutrition, reduc<strong>in</strong>g poverty and generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cash <strong>in</strong>comes for resource-poor farmers. The report draws on a range of case studies across<br />

SSA to compare and contrast the reasons for success from which lessons can be learned.<br />

The key tasks undertaken to identify the lessons for successful <strong>in</strong>novation were:<br />

• Identification and analysis of a range of successful applications of multiple stakeholder<br />

approaches, learn<strong>in</strong>g lessons and establish<strong>in</strong>g the reasons for success through comparative<br />

analysis. The case studies selected <strong>in</strong>clude those <strong>in</strong>itiated by FARA <strong>in</strong> its SSA CP PLS as well<br />

as other planned and opportunity-driven <strong><strong>in</strong>novations</strong><br />

• Review of available literature on each case study<br />

• Discussions with stakeholders and other key <strong>in</strong>formants associated with the case studies<br />

• Comparative analysis of the challenges addressed, <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangements and<br />

stakeholder <strong>in</strong>teraction, the benefits aris<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g production development or added<br />

value to products) and, where possible, the number of beneficiaries<br />

• Identification of the technological, policy and <strong>in</strong>stitutional <strong><strong>in</strong>novations</strong> that fostered the<br />

success stories<br />

• Critical review of the successes, their outcomes, and lessons learned.<br />

A total of 21 case studies, six <strong>in</strong> Eastern Africa, eight <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa and seven <strong>in</strong> West Africa<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded six funded under FARA’s SSA CP were used. Selection was based on a representative<br />

sample across the three sub-regions and <strong>in</strong>cluded:<br />

• Traditional sectors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g subsistence crops – sometimes processed<br />

• Niche sectors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g specialist crops<br />

• Sectors <strong>in</strong>tegrated with global markets through export commodities<br />

• Sectors offer<strong>in</strong>g large employment opportunities for the poor, aimed at either local or<br />

export commodities.<br />

In many cases more than one of these sectors was applicable. Other factors <strong>in</strong>cluded:<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>g staple food production and develop<strong>in</strong>g process<strong>in</strong>g techniques; <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

people and the environment; develop<strong>in</strong>g local organisations; establish<strong>in</strong>g of public–private<br />

18 Agricultural Innovation <strong>in</strong> Sub-Saharan Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!