agrl_innovations_in_ssa.pdf?utm_content=buffercb41d&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
agrl_innovations_in_ssa.pdf?utm_content=buffercb41d&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
agrl_innovations_in_ssa.pdf?utm_content=buffercb41d&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
poor road access, lack of power and <strong>in</strong>adequate market<strong>in</strong>g facilities. Under <strong>in</strong>stitutions,<br />
challenges <strong>in</strong>cluded weak <strong>in</strong>stitutional structures, often compounded by little contact or<br />
conflicts between stakeholders. In addition the absence of, or poor farmer organisation<br />
meant that producer organisations were often unable to take the <strong>in</strong>itiative. Poorly developed<br />
markets, aga<strong>in</strong> poor <strong>in</strong>frastructure, high cost of <strong>in</strong>puts and low producer prices compounded<br />
these problems. Under support services, challenges <strong>in</strong>cluded poor access to <strong>in</strong>puts due to lack<br />
of f<strong>in</strong>ance and market facilities, a lack of or poor access to knowledge and poor extension<br />
sometimes associated with <strong>in</strong>appropriate research. Consequently challenges to improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
farm<strong>in</strong>g systems <strong>in</strong>cluded use of unsuitable varieties, pests, diseases and poor management<br />
practices, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> low or decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g yields and hence low <strong>in</strong>comes for farmers. These<br />
challenges are summarised <strong>in</strong> Figure 3, and detailed for each case study <strong>in</strong> Table 4<br />
Figure 3: Challenges identified<br />
A comparative analysis of the case studies 83