08.11.2014 Views

Download - Foreign Military Studies Office - U.S. Army

Download - Foreign Military Studies Office - U.S. Army

Download - Foreign Military Studies Office - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and other precision-guided missiles on the illusory threat? Could it result in<br />

command and control decisions that put nuclear forces in a ready-to-launch<br />

status once other assets are exhausted? The world would be poised on the brink<br />

of a holocaust for the sake of false images on a computer display. There are no<br />

guarantees that all cultures/nations will be capable of including some type of<br />

“fail-safe” rules in their software to guard against such an accidental launch.<br />

When a programmer writes code, it is written to fulfill a task. As one<br />

specialist has noted, it “is a task as a human sees it: full of unexpressed<br />

knowledge, implicit associations, allusions to allusions. Its coherence comes<br />

from knowledge structures deep in the body, from experience, memory.” 369<br />

The issue of human knowledge mechanisms, as they relate to culture, language<br />

and the means of expression, is quite complex. It is reasonable to suggest,<br />

however, that if (IF) different cultures think differently in terms of logic and<br />

perception, then there is no reason why this practice might not affect the way<br />

they program. 370 However, perhaps more pertinent at this moment, any<br />

difference in programming will be swamped by basic differences (how cultures<br />

develop and interpret computer displays, what they design the system to<br />

provide, etc.). The suggestion offered here is that cultures will specify tasks<br />

differently to solve problems (for example, the manner in which heads up<br />

displays are developed for the helmets of Russian versus American fighter<br />

pilots).<br />

Two Russian analysts who studied the implications of the digitized age<br />

added other characteristics of the digital context, noting that:<br />

• Collection is becoming more closely linked with the analysis and<br />

processing of data—that is the entire effort is much more integrated<br />

than before.<br />

• Human involvement is decreasing, especially in the collection and<br />

processing phases.<br />

• Just as virtual reality is blurring the geo-political boundaries of<br />

information space, so it blurs the enemy image—is it a state<br />

(nation, country) or transnational (drug cartel, terrorist) threat?<br />

• Distance is not as important as time (implementation and decisionmaking<br />

elements).<br />

• Software may become hostile to mankind if it replicates and gives<br />

birth to systems of growing complexity, or self-destructs. 371<br />

369 Ellen Ullman, Wired, April 1999, p. 128.<br />

370 Discussion with Ms. Ullman via email, 6 April 1999.<br />

371 Yuriy Baturin and Sergey Modestov, “Intelligence in Virtual Reality,” Vooruzheniy<br />

Politica Konversiya [Equipment, Politics, Conversion], No. 1-2, 1998, pp. 53-56.<br />

204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!