08.11.2014 Views

Download - Foreign Military Studies Office - U.S. Army

Download - Foreign Military Studies Office - U.S. Army

Download - Foreign Military Studies Office - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cease Fires<br />

Anytime there was a chance that a cease-fire would freeze the status<br />

quo on the ground, the conflicting sides would launch last-minute offensives to<br />

gain what territory they could before the cease-fire began. 396 Then, they would<br />

manipulate the cease-fire by repositioning and resupplying their forces during<br />

the lull in the action. 397<br />

Clearly, manipulation was used in each of these vignettes, which<br />

represent only a few among hundreds of examples. Exactly what is<br />

manipulation, and how can we discern between it and the other persuasion<br />

concepts, such as perception management, PSYOP, deception, or<br />

disinformation?<br />

Manipulation has traditionally been looked at as a means by which to<br />

accomplish an action. For example, the DOD definition of deception utilizes<br />

manipulation in this manner:<br />

Those measures designed to mislead the enemy by manipulation,<br />

distortion, or falsification of evidence to induce him to react in a<br />

manner prejudicial to his interests. 398<br />

The action verb here is to mislead, and the goal is to induce a reaction. Joint<br />

Publication 1-02 defines perception management and PSYOP in a similar<br />

manner:<br />

perception management–actions to convey and/or deny selected<br />

information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their<br />

emotions, motives, and objective reasoning; and to intelligence systems<br />

and leaders at all levels to influence official estimates, ultimately<br />

resulting in foreign behaviors and official actions favorable to the<br />

396 Ibid., p. 309.<br />

397 The combatants further adjusted to their new environment and used it to their<br />

advantage. For example, it was reported the combatants exploited the “confrontation<br />

line” that was one drawn on UNPROFOR maps designating the boundary between the<br />

sides. A road crossed the line several times. When a UN vehicle traveled on it—and<br />

thus moved in and out of the combatants’ territories—a mortar crew from one side<br />

would sneak onto the other side’s territory and fire on the UN vehicle making it look as<br />

if the “home” side did the shooting. In another example, there were reports that one side<br />

used a third country and a lot of money to plant stories in the US press to gain<br />

sympathy for its cause. See LTC John Sray’s article “Selling the Bosnian Myth to<br />

America: Buyer Beware” at http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil.<br />

398 Field Manual 33-1, p. 8 of the Glossary at the end of the manual.<br />

217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!