DSpace at Khazar University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

c. quantity of product gathered from each ha. When rising of the level of the first and third indicator, effectiveness of the using of the land increases too, but uptrend of the second indicator vice versa decreases the effectiveness. Effectiveness of the using of the labor (labor force) is characterized by the following indicators: a. amount of the new generated value per employer; b. quantity of labor per unit of the product (people-hour). Uptrend of the first indicator positively influence on effectiveness and increases its level. Rising of the second indicator is in inverse proportion with the rising of the effectiveness. Or when rising of the number of the people-days per unit of the product, effectiveness decreases. Effectiveness of the using of the capital is defined on the base of the following indicators: a. fund of returning (value of total production per 100 manat of fixed production asset); b. productivity indicators in cattle-breeding (yield of milk from each head of mother, rise of weight, and breeding (meat production) per head of mother), childbearing per 100 head of mother, shearing of the wool per sheep, egg per hen, and etc.); c. productivity (new generated (added) value per 1, 10, 100 manat of intermediate consumption expenditure) (see table 12); d. cost ratio (intermediate consumption expenditure per 1, 10, 100 manat of new generated (added) value) (see table 13). Uptrend of the first three indicators increases effectiveness, but when rising of fourth indicator effectiveness falls down. Third and fourth indicators are opposite to each other. General economic effectiveness charecterizes final result, is created under the influence of the indicators showen above and is calculated in accordance with the following formula: E ef = N v / I c * 100 (3), 134
N v is new generated value, I c is intermediate consumption expenditures. In literature it is proposed to calculate effectiveness as the ratio of value of sold production to production cost (6, 262). It seems to us that such approach doesn’t fully reflect reality. Firstly, income from the sale (value of sold production) in general may be compared not with production cost, but only with the production cost of sold output. This method may be considered correct only for marketable large producers. Secondly, under condition of modern economic relation entrepreneur uses large part of produced output for various intraeconomic aims, swaps by the commodity exchange and uses for other aims. In this circumstance the ratio of the value of sold product to production cost doesn’t allow to come to a correct conclusion, effectiveness indicator fall down and some times false result of unprofitability arises. At last if one speak about effectiveness of sold product, it is possible to agree with colleague’s proposal. But statement of problem is the production effectiveness. Result of production is considered effective if received against cost (intermediate consumption expenditure) value, new generated (added) value allows fulfill finance obligation and entrepreneur gain spare money balances (net disposable income). It is naturally that entrepreneur to fulfill production functions and obligations, achieve an object, gain net profit must have modern production culture and effectively use produced output. Table 11 Productivity of the new generated (added) value in the production of livestock cluster by Azerbaijan regions in 2009, per 100 manat of intermediate consumption expediture 135
Page 1 and 2:
KHAZAR UNIVERSITY Ministry of Educa
Page 3 and 4:
CHAPTER 5. Analysis of research fin
Page 5 and 6:
Strategy evaluation can be a comple
Page 7 and 8:
There are ways of dealing with thes
Page 9 and 10:
Chapter 4 includes structure analys
Page 11 and 12:
By careful study of these definitio
Page 13 and 14:
1-1-2. Recognizing of the Subject i
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 2. 1-2- Background of the r
Page 17 and 18:
1-2-3. Objective and its role The f
Page 19 and 20:
esist the shift. So there should be
Page 21 and 22:
f- Production factors. Socio-econom
Page 23 and 24:
a- Computer changes. b- Changes in
Page 25 and 26:
approaches like common management,
Page 27 and 28:
We should pick patterns which can p
Page 29 and 30:
Part two Recognizing and analyzing
Page 31 and 32:
c. Researcher evaluates the informa
Page 33 and 34:
The formal approach to predict a te
Page 35 and 36:
Potential competitors: We can predi
Page 37 and 38:
In these stages the manager should
Page 39 and 40:
In trying to assess the influences
Page 41 and 42:
Fashion favors the structure of the
Page 43 and 44:
To enable the top managers to maint
Page 45 and 46:
configuration, the innovative organ
Page 47 and 48:
organizations, usually hardly any a
Page 49 and 50:
There are a number of factors which
Page 51 and 52:
have strong relationships with thei
Page 53 and 54:
industry. This enables us to identi
Page 55 and 56:
ones by operating proactively upon
Page 57 and 58:
standards are established. Competit
Page 59 and 60:
captive clients. Or the product may
Page 61 and 62:
competitors? e. In what areas might
Page 63 and 64:
coordinate the separate activities?
Page 65 and 66:
"professional" organizations like a
Page 67 and 68:
processes is either specialization
Page 69 and 70:
contingency approach is probably Mi
Page 71 and 72:
structural changes are introduced.
Page 73 and 74:
of environmental dynamism and task
Page 75 and 76:
pace of new product introductions i
Page 77 and 78:
coordination across the separated f
Page 79 and 80:
messy, complex and stressful. Routi
Page 81 and 82:
understand and relatively straightf
Page 83 and 84: The statement needs to be concise,
Page 85 and 86: Looked at in this light, it is clea
Page 87 and 88: strategy indicate that the organiza
Page 89 and 90: these types of questions are affirm
Page 91 and 92: Lindsay and Rue hypothesized that s
Page 93 and 94: Determining which objectives are mo
Page 95 and 96: stated objectives. In his thought-p
Page 97 and 98: provide timely information; on occa
Page 99 and 100: Too many organizations discard alte
Page 101 and 102: In a recent article, Shimell emphas
Page 103 and 104: Even the most technically perfect s
Page 105 and 106: Part Three Practical application Ch
Page 107 and 108: agriculture, development of farmer
Page 109 and 110: subbranches: plant-growing, plant g
Page 111 and 112: Additional products are used for fe
Page 113 and 114: According to this feature, to count
Page 115 and 116: Meanwhile, to get macroeconomic res
Page 117 and 118: Plan indicators, statistical counti
Page 119 and 120: Macroeconomic indicators in the agr
Page 121 and 122: esults of economic activity of Azer
Page 123 and 124: Absheron Gazakh Zagatala Lankaran K
Page 125 and 126: Then purchase (consumer) prices of
Page 127 and 128: Absheron Ganja-Gazakh Sheki-Zagatal
Page 133: Net profit remain at producer’s (
Page 137 and 138: It is naturally that in that last t
Page 139 and 140: Economic researches give opportunit
Page 141 and 142: The determined legal base serve imp
Page 143 and 144: information relations between scien
Page 145 and 146: enumerated in accordance with the d
Page 147 and 148: At the result of generalization of
Page 149 and 150: CONCLUSION This chapter presents a
Page 151 and 152: Bibliography 1. ALDRICH, H.E., Orga
Page 153: 33. RUMELT, R.P. Strategy, Structur
show all

DSpace at Khazar University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?