Full Report - Subregional Office for East and North-East Asia - escap
Full Report - Subregional Office for East and North-East Asia - escap
Full Report - Subregional Office for East and North-East Asia - escap
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE AND POLICY CHALLENGES AT THE SUBREGIONAL LEVEL CHAPTER 2<br />
Figure 2.15. Budget balance in selected South-<strong>East</strong> <strong>Asia</strong>n economies, 2010-2012<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Percentage of GDP<br />
-2<br />
-4<br />
-6<br />
-8<br />
Cambodia<br />
Indonesia<br />
Lao People's<br />
Democratic Republic<br />
Malaysia<br />
Myanmar<br />
Philippines<br />
Singapore<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong><br />
Viet Nam<br />
-10<br />
2010 2011 2012<br />
Sources: ESCAP, based on national sources; <strong>and</strong> CEIC Data Company Limited. Available from http://ceicdata.com (accessed on 30 March 2013).<br />
Note: Data <strong>for</strong> 2012 are estimates.<br />
Malaysia, the focus is on efficient revenue collection<br />
<strong>and</strong> value <strong>for</strong> money <strong>for</strong> spending programmes.<br />
Domestic resource mobilization remains a particular<br />
challenge <strong>for</strong> low-income countries. Despite a<br />
reduction in fiscal deficit in 2012, Cambodia’s overall<br />
tax-to-GDP ratio has remained at about 10-11%<br />
of GDP since 2008. To address this issue, the<br />
Government introduced a new strategy <strong>for</strong> revenue<br />
mobilization. The Lao People’s Democratic Republic<br />
has been more successful in raising the tax-to-GDP<br />
ratio, with non-natural resources-based revenue<br />
increasing with the introduction of value added<br />
taxes in 2010. In Myanmar, as part of the country’s<br />
ongoing economic re<strong>for</strong>ms, the Government plans<br />
to simplify the commercial tax on domestic sales<br />
<strong>and</strong> enhance tax administration <strong>and</strong> capacity.<br />
Monetary policy supports growth while<br />
curbing short-term inflows<br />
Monetary policy was supportive of economic growth<br />
across the subregion in the light of the heightened<br />
global economic uncertainty. In particular, policy<br />
interest rates were at historically low levels. The<br />
Philippines central bank cut the overnight rate four<br />
times in 2012 to a record low level of 3.5%. In<br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>, the policy interest rate was lowered to<br />
support the recovery from a sharp, flood-related<br />
economic downturn <strong>and</strong> was further reduced to<br />
2.75% in October 2012 as the global economic<br />
slowdown deepened. The Indonesian central bank<br />
resumed policy interest rate cuts in late 2011 <strong>and</strong><br />
early 2012 but has since left it unchanged amid<br />
strong domestic dem<strong>and</strong>; still, the level of 5.75% as<br />
of February 2013 is lower than the trough recorded<br />
during the peak of the global crisis. Unlike most<br />
peers in the subregion, Malaysia left unchanged<br />
its policy interest rate since May 2011 on resilient<br />
domestic dem<strong>and</strong>, but the current level of 3% is<br />
still lower than the pre-crisis level of 3.5%.<br />
Low interest rates translated into a double-digit growth<br />
in consumer <strong>and</strong> business loans in Indonesia <strong>and</strong><br />
the Philippines. While the banking sector remained<br />
generally healthy, the central banks used various<br />
macroprudential measures to ensure financial stability.<br />
In the Philippines, the central bank redefined real<br />
estate activities to lessen the bank’s exposure to<br />
the sector. In Indonesia, a more stringent rule on<br />
down payments was announced in mid-2012 to<br />
slow credit growth <strong>for</strong> the purchase of housing<br />
<strong>and</strong> automobiles. Similarly in Malaysia, asset price<br />
build-ups in certain sectors have been dealt with<br />
by using macroprudential measures rather than<br />
changes in the policy rate.<br />
At the same time, countries remained vigilant to<br />
the impact of liquidity injections in the advanced<br />
economies, in particular the pressure on exchange<br />
125