Full Report - Subregional Office for East and North-East Asia - escap
Full Report - Subregional Office for East and North-East Asia - escap
Full Report - Subregional Office for East and North-East Asia - escap
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE STATE OF INCLUSIVE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN UNCERTAIN TIMES CHAPTER 1<br />
2006). Access to electricity is not available <strong>for</strong> more<br />
than a billion people in <strong>Asia</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Pacific, the<br />
majority of which are rural poor.<br />
Rural farmers have found their access to finance<br />
constrained, in particular as a result of the structural<br />
adjustment programmes of the 1980s as well as<br />
the removal of subsidized credit schemes. With<br />
financial deregulation <strong>and</strong> changes in monetary<br />
policy, schemes of specialized credit <strong>and</strong> agricultural<br />
refinance operated by central banks are no longer<br />
available. Rediscount rates are now set by many<br />
central banks <strong>and</strong> specific sectors are not directly<br />
supported. Lending <strong>for</strong> agriculture by commercial<br />
banks is naturally curtailed in response to low<br />
returns <strong>and</strong> lack of availability of collateral.<br />
Expenditure on agricultural research<br />
<strong>and</strong> development in <strong>Asia</strong>-Pacific<br />
remains much lower than in developed<br />
countries<br />
While expenditure on research <strong>and</strong> development in<br />
the <strong>Asia</strong>-Pacific region has gradually increased, it<br />
remains much lower than in developed countries.<br />
Furthermore, in some countries it either declined<br />
or remained stagnant. In China, research <strong>and</strong><br />
development spending decreased in 2000 to 0.4%<br />
of value-added in agriculture from 0.57% in the<br />
early 1960s. In Thail<strong>and</strong>, there has been little<br />
increase over the decades, with research <strong>and</strong><br />
development spending remaining at 0.4-0.5% since<br />
the 1970s, though there has been some recent<br />
upward movement. India increased its research <strong>and</strong><br />
development expenditure in the 2000s from 0.18%<br />
of agricultural value-added to 0.34%.<br />
The share of the private sector in agricultural<br />
research <strong>and</strong> development in the <strong>Asia</strong>-Pacific region<br />
is appallingly low at approximately 8% compared<br />
with about 54% in developed countries. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />
governments have to play a much larger role in<br />
lifting agricultural productivity by investing in research<br />
<strong>and</strong> development, rural infrastructure <strong>and</strong> extension<br />
services as well as improving access to education<br />
<strong>and</strong> health <strong>for</strong> improving human capital.<br />
Improvement in agricultural productivity is critical <strong>for</strong><br />
not only insulating the region from the volatility<br />
of global markets <strong>and</strong> enhancing food security,<br />
but also to reduce poverty <strong>and</strong> inequality. ESCAP<br />
estimates show that a 1% increase in agricultural<br />
productivity would lead to a 0.37% drop in poverty<br />
in the <strong>Asia</strong>-Pacific region (ESCAP, 2008). Given the<br />
large agricultural labour productivity gaps among<br />
countries in the region, the potential gains would be<br />
substantial. For example, raising the region’s average<br />
agricultural productivity to the level of Thail<strong>and</strong>,<br />
could take 218 million people out of poverty. India<br />
has the most to gain from accelerated agricultural<br />
productivity growth, with nearly two-thirds of the<br />
region’s poor <strong>and</strong> a large agricultural productivity gap.<br />
In this context, in past years, ESCAP highlighted<br />
the need <strong>for</strong> a second “green revolution” based on<br />
sustainable agriculture to raise the region’s agricultural<br />
productivity (ESCAP, 2009b; <strong>and</strong> 2010a).<br />
Unsustainable resource use<br />
Industrialization <strong>and</strong> an exp<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> increasingly<br />
affluent consumer base have boosted the dem<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>for</strong> all kinds of resources. Trends in the use of<br />
biomass, energy, construction <strong>and</strong> other minerals<br />
show that while the economies of other regions<br />
of the world are becoming less resource-intensive<br />
over time, the <strong>Asia</strong>-Pacific economy is requiring<br />
more resources to produce one dollar of GDP as<br />
the economy grows (see figure 1.25). One factor<br />
behind this is the still-significant unmet needs of<br />
developing countries in the region. However, a<br />
large part can be attributed to economic growth<br />
strategies employed by countries. Notably, the region<br />
as a whole in 2008 used almost twice the input<br />
of resources 16 to create one unit of GDP as the<br />
global economy.<br />
Figure 1.26 shows that while the per capita domestic<br />
material consumption in the <strong>Asia</strong>n <strong>and</strong> Pacific region<br />
is still below that of the world, the gap narrowed<br />
significantly between 1992 <strong>and</strong> 2008. The use<br />
of resources in economies in the Pacific, <strong>East</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>North</strong>-<strong>East</strong> <strong>Asia</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>North</strong> <strong>and</strong> Central <strong>Asia</strong><br />
which have more affluent lifestyles, rely heavily<br />
57