19.11.2014 Views

Full Report - Subregional Office for East and North-East Asia - escap

Full Report - Subregional Office for East and North-East Asia - escap

Full Report - Subregional Office for East and North-East Asia - escap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE STATE OF INCLUSIVE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN UNCERTAIN TIMES CHAPTER 1<br />

2006). Access to electricity is not available <strong>for</strong> more<br />

than a billion people in <strong>Asia</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Pacific, the<br />

majority of which are rural poor.<br />

Rural farmers have found their access to finance<br />

constrained, in particular as a result of the structural<br />

adjustment programmes of the 1980s as well as<br />

the removal of subsidized credit schemes. With<br />

financial deregulation <strong>and</strong> changes in monetary<br />

policy, schemes of specialized credit <strong>and</strong> agricultural<br />

refinance operated by central banks are no longer<br />

available. Rediscount rates are now set by many<br />

central banks <strong>and</strong> specific sectors are not directly<br />

supported. Lending <strong>for</strong> agriculture by commercial<br />

banks is naturally curtailed in response to low<br />

returns <strong>and</strong> lack of availability of collateral.<br />

Expenditure on agricultural research<br />

<strong>and</strong> development in <strong>Asia</strong>-Pacific<br />

remains much lower than in developed<br />

countries<br />

While expenditure on research <strong>and</strong> development in<br />

the <strong>Asia</strong>-Pacific region has gradually increased, it<br />

remains much lower than in developed countries.<br />

Furthermore, in some countries it either declined<br />

or remained stagnant. In China, research <strong>and</strong><br />

development spending decreased in 2000 to 0.4%<br />

of value-added in agriculture from 0.57% in the<br />

early 1960s. In Thail<strong>and</strong>, there has been little<br />

increase over the decades, with research <strong>and</strong><br />

development spending remaining at 0.4-0.5% since<br />

the 1970s, though there has been some recent<br />

upward movement. India increased its research <strong>and</strong><br />

development expenditure in the 2000s from 0.18%<br />

of agricultural value-added to 0.34%.<br />

The share of the private sector in agricultural<br />

research <strong>and</strong> development in the <strong>Asia</strong>-Pacific region<br />

is appallingly low at approximately 8% compared<br />

with about 54% in developed countries. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

governments have to play a much larger role in<br />

lifting agricultural productivity by investing in research<br />

<strong>and</strong> development, rural infrastructure <strong>and</strong> extension<br />

services as well as improving access to education<br />

<strong>and</strong> health <strong>for</strong> improving human capital.<br />

Improvement in agricultural productivity is critical <strong>for</strong><br />

not only insulating the region from the volatility<br />

of global markets <strong>and</strong> enhancing food security,<br />

but also to reduce poverty <strong>and</strong> inequality. ESCAP<br />

estimates show that a 1% increase in agricultural<br />

productivity would lead to a 0.37% drop in poverty<br />

in the <strong>Asia</strong>-Pacific region (ESCAP, 2008). Given the<br />

large agricultural labour productivity gaps among<br />

countries in the region, the potential gains would be<br />

substantial. For example, raising the region’s average<br />

agricultural productivity to the level of Thail<strong>and</strong>,<br />

could take 218 million people out of poverty. India<br />

has the most to gain from accelerated agricultural<br />

productivity growth, with nearly two-thirds of the<br />

region’s poor <strong>and</strong> a large agricultural productivity gap.<br />

In this context, in past years, ESCAP highlighted<br />

the need <strong>for</strong> a second “green revolution” based on<br />

sustainable agriculture to raise the region’s agricultural<br />

productivity (ESCAP, 2009b; <strong>and</strong> 2010a).<br />

Unsustainable resource use<br />

Industrialization <strong>and</strong> an exp<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> increasingly<br />

affluent consumer base have boosted the dem<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> all kinds of resources. Trends in the use of<br />

biomass, energy, construction <strong>and</strong> other minerals<br />

show that while the economies of other regions<br />

of the world are becoming less resource-intensive<br />

over time, the <strong>Asia</strong>-Pacific economy is requiring<br />

more resources to produce one dollar of GDP as<br />

the economy grows (see figure 1.25). One factor<br />

behind this is the still-significant unmet needs of<br />

developing countries in the region. However, a<br />

large part can be attributed to economic growth<br />

strategies employed by countries. Notably, the region<br />

as a whole in 2008 used almost twice the input<br />

of resources 16 to create one unit of GDP as the<br />

global economy.<br />

Figure 1.26 shows that while the per capita domestic<br />

material consumption in the <strong>Asia</strong>n <strong>and</strong> Pacific region<br />

is still below that of the world, the gap narrowed<br />

significantly between 1992 <strong>and</strong> 2008. The use<br />

of resources in economies in the Pacific, <strong>East</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>North</strong>-<strong>East</strong> <strong>Asia</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>North</strong> <strong>and</strong> Central <strong>Asia</strong><br />

which have more affluent lifestyles, rely heavily<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!