19.11.2014 Views

Full Report - Subregional Office for East and North-East Asia - escap

Full Report - Subregional Office for East and North-East Asia - escap

Full Report - Subregional Office for East and North-East Asia - escap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SURVEY OF ASIA AND THE PACIFIC 2013<br />

prove inaccurate, in part due to a lack of full<br />

accounting of the size of stock of <strong>for</strong>eign short-term<br />

capital which has built up in economies over recent<br />

years. The ESCAP vulnerability measure provides a<br />

measure of reserve adequacy taking into account a<br />

comprehensive estimate of the stock of such capital<br />

inflows. It indicates that a number of economies<br />

in the region remain significantly vulnerable to a<br />

renewed episode of short-term capital flight (see<br />

figure 1.11).<br />

The other key concern pertaining to using <strong>for</strong>eign<br />

reserve accumulation as the primary approach to<br />

addressing pressure on economic management<br />

from the entry of short-term capital flows is that<br />

such an approach does not deal with the impact<br />

on asset markets of any sudden outflow. While<br />

exchange rate depreciation may be moderated by<br />

the use of reserves, equity or property markets<br />

could nevertheless decline sharply <strong>and</strong> substantially,<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e causing hardship <strong>for</strong> domestic investors<br />

<strong>and</strong> possibly initiating a banking crisis. This<br />

problem highlights the fact that <strong>for</strong>eign reserves<br />

accumulation is a second-best approach to dealing<br />

with such inflows as it does not tackle them at the<br />

source of entry <strong>and</strong> there<strong>for</strong>e does not address<br />

the various negative impacts within economies of<br />

such inflows.<br />

An effective approach <strong>for</strong> managing disruptive shortterm<br />

capital inflows is to limit the quantity <strong>and</strong><br />

areas of the financial sector in which such flows<br />

may enter. Capital controls, as recommended by<br />

ESCAP <strong>for</strong> a number of years (ESCAP, 2010a), <strong>and</strong><br />

other macroprudential measures have been gaining<br />

in popularity in recent years as policymakers are<br />

increasingly realizing that economies are living with<br />

a “new normal” of consistent pressure on their asset<br />

markets from <strong>for</strong>eign investors due to the global<br />

environment. To protect the independence of their<br />

macroeconomic policies, governments have been<br />

willing to give up the dubious benefits of dependence<br />

on easily reversible short-term capital flows in order<br />

to be able to dictate their own exchange rate policies<br />

<strong>and</strong> protect their citizens <strong>and</strong> banking sectors from<br />

excessive dependence on the whims of the global<br />

financial markets.<br />

Uncertainties regarding the causes <strong>and</strong> effects of<br />

inflow surges, as well as the country, sector <strong>and</strong><br />

time specific aspects defining capital inflows call<br />

<strong>for</strong> a careful strategy towards mitigating possible<br />

negative effects. This has been true of the <strong>Asia</strong>-<br />

Pacific region <strong>for</strong> decades, particularly as more than<br />

60% of past inflow surges have ended suddenly. 10<br />

It is particularly relevant now in the region due to<br />

the unpredictable effects demonstrated by successive<br />

Figure 1.11. Vulnerability yardstick as a percentage of <strong>for</strong>eign reserves in selected developing <strong>Asia</strong>-Pacific<br />

economies<br />

China<br />

Russian Federation<br />

Least<br />

vulnerable<br />

Kazakhstan<br />

Philippines<br />

Thail<strong>and</strong><br />

India<br />

Indonesia<br />

Malaysia<br />

Republic of Korea<br />

Most<br />

vulnerable<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250<br />

Sources: ESCAP, based on data from CEIC Data Company Limited. Available from http://ceicdata.com (accessed on 6 March 2013).<br />

Note: Vulnerability yardstick is the sum of short-term external debt, latest quarterly imports based on four-quarter moving average <strong>and</strong> estimated<br />

international portfolio investment position. Based on latest avaliable data.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!