For Lilian and the Indigos - Above Top Secret

then disappeared. We do not know if this was teleportation or if someone threw it
out.”
These are just some samples from dozens of similar submissions.
OK so NASA BPP has shared with us the 9% comical pathological submissions and
stated that these people (myself included) have accounted for most of the difficulty they
have had – at what exactly is not mentioned.
Here again is what they excerpted from my email:
"To tell you the truth Marc, I'm a pot smoking mushroom munching high school dropout
and I'm qualified to do two things; wash dishes and invent shit. … I've got other
inventions too - an electrochemical computer, ultrasonic foaming process, magnepulsion
generator, solid state over-unity device, various concept vehicles, centrifugal antigravity
drives, and buttloads of more practical inventions."
I'll be the first to admit that this is a very bad business letter (but good fun) and that my
zeal is far from tempered. I was f-ing with them because I knew at that point I’d never be
taken seriously anyway. I can acknowledge how this is detrimental to the cause, both
mine and theirs. What they did not excerpt is the actual IP for a device that would, in
theory, reduce inertial mass of any matter within its field, effectively phase-shifting a
craft and pilot into hyperspace. They did not acknowledge that despite the lack of
professionalism my abstract was EXACTLY what they are looking for.
This is where my criticism begins.
Firstly the dichotomy between proponents and skeptics is relative. NASA BPP thinks of
itself as a proponent when it is a skeptic too. They dismiss an idea because of its source;
they are not as open minded as they'd like to think. They lumped together my submission
with the submissions of blatant psychos because I had mentioned drug use. Perhaps they
saw the nature of my other IP and considered it a Delusion of Grandeur.
NASA BPP is the first to admit that genuinely good ideas can appear to be insane.
History has proven this to be true. Would it stand to reason then that an inventor can be a
genuinely good inventor despite his Delusions of Grandeur? For example there was an
inventor at the turn of the 20th century who actually thought he could build a transmitter
that would send information and energy to any point on the earth. He also believed that
he could extract energy from the air, talk to Martians and zap down enemy aircraft with
particle beams – why, he must be INSANE! That man, Nikola Tesla, is responsible for
the AC that runs the modern world and he was pathological – he had a germ phobia, he
had OCD, and an obsession with the number 3. Today in some circles he is a demigod, in
others continually suppressed, erased from history...