For Lilian and the Indigos - Above Top Secret
For Lilian and the Indigos - Above Top Secret
For Lilian and the Indigos - Above Top Secret
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
GOD/SON LOGIC<br />
An eschatological interpretation of Intelligent Design with The Christ/Kalki as a Novelty<br />
Conserving Constant<br />
Ra<strong>the</strong>r than contextualize ID as a conspiracy of <strong>the</strong> religious right <strong>and</strong>/or a<br />
pseudoscientific attempt to compromise evolution, maybe ID could st<strong>and</strong> on its own as a<br />
means of integrating a more esoteric, enlightened mono<strong>the</strong>ism with what science is<br />
learning about complexity. Maybe ID could become, accidentally or appropriately, <strong>the</strong><br />
superseding belief structure we're intended to coalesce.<br />
Firstly, let's define a common language. Since we are dealing with <strong>the</strong> be all, end all<br />
questions, our polarized lexicon fails to convey universally acceptable answers. When<br />
dealing with concepts such as creation, negentropy, self-assembly, chaos, complexity,<br />
biomimicry, scale-invariant self-similarity, Zero Point Energy, etc…any attempt at<br />
integration, even within similar fields, much less <strong>the</strong> disparate situation here, tends to<br />
sound cranky. This being acknowledged perhaps we can agree that:<br />
1 – Scientific <strong>and</strong> Religious lexicon isn't mutually exclusive to <strong>the</strong> truth, only consensus<br />
reality.<br />
2 – O<strong>the</strong>rwise separate ideas can be found to be synonymous through deductive<br />
reasoning. <strong>For</strong> example, GOD=G.U.T. (Gr<strong>and</strong> Unified Theory). The concept of "God"<br />
must account for all that science produces if God is to be defined, in part, as "The Creator<br />
of all that is." Likewise, if a G.U.T. can't explain <strong>the</strong> absurd novelty found in nature,<br />
particularly our biosphere, <strong>and</strong> if it can't explain all <strong>the</strong> paranormal phenomena in our<br />
collective experience, <strong>the</strong>n science is just ano<strong>the</strong>r religion.<br />
3 – An integrated <strong>the</strong>ory will require personal compromise, not conceptual compromise,<br />
as <strong>the</strong> truth was <strong>the</strong> truth before we sought it in integrated form.<br />
From The Tao of Physics to What The Bleep Do We Know?, <strong>the</strong> endeavor to bridge<br />
science <strong>and</strong> spirit has always depended on language. New metaphors are always being<br />
invented, not for <strong>the</strong> sake of being metaphors of course, but in <strong>the</strong>ir association of<br />
differing systems <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir specialized jargon always resolves a little more truth. The<br />
Judeo-Christian Cannon is not at all useful to our task of integration unless one does<br />
away with literalism. The occult meaning of most parables <strong>and</strong> symbols are in fact<br />
describing metaphysics <strong>and</strong> physics. The "meta" prefix means that <strong>the</strong> knowledge<br />
imparted can't necessarily be subject to science although it can be subjectively verified.<br />
When one underst<strong>and</strong>s biblical esoterica, <strong>the</strong> consistency between science <strong>and</strong> spirit<br />
becomes greater. <strong>For</strong> example The Mustard Seed Parable is a metaphor for how small,<br />
simple seed conditions can grow into enormous bushy attractors. Like it or not Jesus<br />
perfectly described The Butterfly Effect as it manifests as creation itself. In a text not in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Bible, Jesus compares <strong>the</strong> multiverse, his "Kingdom/Mansions," to a tapestry where<br />
one side is a grid <strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, patterns are woven into <strong>the</strong> grid. Sounds like Bohm's<br />
Implicate <strong>and</strong> Explicate orders respectively. He compared <strong>the</strong> journey of <strong>the</strong> soul to that