For Lilian and the Indigos - Above Top Secret
For Lilian and the Indigos - Above Top Secret
For Lilian and the Indigos - Above Top Secret
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
DOMINION VS. DESTRUCTION<br />
The final revision of <strong>the</strong> church <strong>and</strong> beating <strong>the</strong> Right at <strong>the</strong>ir own game…<br />
Historically, revisionism splinters <strong>the</strong> church when modern issues encroach <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> a<br />
moral, bible-based consideration. As is often <strong>the</strong> case <strong>the</strong> splinter group hangs its<br />
rationale on a subjective, singular premise, by which it identifies its revised status.<br />
Today I saw Bill Moyers of PBS investigate <strong>the</strong> current rift forming among evangelicals<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> church in general. This dialogue between religion <strong>and</strong> environmentalism is long<br />
overdue <strong>and</strong> is expounded upon in DEEP ECOLOGY <strong>and</strong> WORLD RELIGIONS – New<br />
Essays on Sacred Ground. Written <strong>and</strong> edited by "Left" authors, <strong>the</strong> book begins with a<br />
simple idea, "If you love God <strong>the</strong>n you love <strong>the</strong> earth." Does this supersede <strong>and</strong> hold up<br />
against a line from Genesis? Is dominion exclusive from stewardship? Even secular<br />
foresters know to replant, even drunkards know to recycle <strong>and</strong> big business knows<br />
building green equals profit via lower overhead.<br />
I identify <strong>the</strong> established Right as <strong>the</strong> splinter group <strong>and</strong> not <strong>the</strong> TreeHuggers. Loving <strong>the</strong><br />
earth <strong>and</strong> doing what's right is apolitical. The Evangelical Right, aligned with Petro-<br />
Politics, can't claim <strong>the</strong>y are doing God’s Will when <strong>the</strong>y leave it all up to Capitalist<br />
Market <strong>For</strong>ces, conversely, nobody can claim that planting a tree is blasphemous. The<br />
Rightwingers may want to ponder <strong>the</strong>ir position <strong>the</strong> next time <strong>the</strong>y're stuck in gridlock<br />
behind a diesel truck.<br />
The Right/Dominator/MufflerHuggers have drawn a line <strong>and</strong> it is appropriate <strong>and</strong><br />
welcome. The body of Christ faces many "wedge" issues, most of which are politically,<br />
<strong>and</strong> not spiritually consequential. This is an issue however that really does warrant<br />
division within <strong>and</strong> without a church/state context, as it affects <strong>the</strong> biosphere, not just <strong>the</strong><br />
vote or soul.<br />
As a Left/Symbiotic/TreeHugger, lover of God <strong>and</strong> Creation, <strong>and</strong> inventor of alternative<br />
energy technologies I agree that we do have dominion, God is in control, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> market<br />
will provide answers. However I also believe God wants a clean, sustainable technology<br />
to dominate <strong>the</strong> market for <strong>the</strong> sake of creation. I believe that by drawing this line <strong>the</strong><br />
right have inadvertently aided Christ in <strong>the</strong> impending division of <strong>the</strong> righteous from <strong>the</strong><br />
unrighteous…. If <strong>the</strong> resultant "Eco-Christians" were to rally behind, <strong>and</strong> get to market,<br />
sane technology we could defeat <strong>the</strong> Right <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir Hydrocarbon Age, but poetically, on<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir terms. Honestly now, can you picture New Jerusalem with smoke stacks, acid rain,<br />
oil spills, nuclear waste <strong>and</strong> smog?<br />
REVELATION 11:18<br />
If <strong>the</strong> Right can quote Genesis to justify <strong>the</strong>ir position I propose we quote a timelier piece<br />
of scripture: