For Lilian and the Indigos - Above Top Secret

Entropy is described as the rate of change within a closed system where degrees of
freedom define the limits of change. The Earth may be considered a closed system (it
isn't really) and the Fossil Fuel Industry may be considered a degree of freedom among
many in a capitalist free market. In the standard economic theory Entropy is called
"diminishing return." Equilibrium is stability; decay is dominant, it is irreversible so
work with it right?
OKAY, so how does a most entropic industry inside an entropic economy gain record
profits? Why do the Arbiters of the EAE do the exact opposite of what is intuitively
correct? Where is it written that capitalism must always manifest as its parasitic,
competitive aspect? Is there an alternate/opposite aspect? Does the current EM theory
disregard all the negentropic stuff on purpose?
Capitalism is the most biomimetic of the three aforementioned social systems; it is an
economic natural selection. In nature there aren't thousands of imposed, studied variables,
only adaptation, opportunism, and survival. There are no cheaters because there are no
rules. In this sense the elitists who wage war with the poor in order to maintain the
economy cannot be guilty, cannot be held to silly notions of morality. They are doing
what they must to maintain their lifestyle/habitat.
The problem here is that a few wealthy elitists are dependant on millions of poor and
millions of poor ARE NOT dependant on a handful of elitists. The whole idea behind a
free market is that it is self-regulating and will produce its own solutions; that's true if it
is actually free, but every aspect of the economy is manipulated – including morality and
population. The economy will either fix itself or the standard theory really is a convoluted
lie.
To determine this, an entirely new shock test must be executed…
When I was in college, a prerequisite class was Economics 101, and I went to it with little
interest but I had one question, "What are the economic implications of mass marketing a
free energy device?" The professor just laughed.
This professor did not look at the world around him. He only conformed to some
elaborate theory. He assumed the Fossil Fuel Industry had such a hold on consensus
reality that it was a given. The current rhetoric concerning our "addiction to oil" and
"energy independence" is thirty years old, it is lip service nobody believes, but that won't
stop inventors and entrepreneurs from holding W to his words.
In the book, COMPLEXITY, Brian Arthur's thoughts regarding "increasing returns"
are expounded with a comparative list: Old Economics vs. New Economics. He never
uses the terms Entropy vs. Negentropy and I don't think he's familiar with Rothschild's
Analogy or Bearden's corrections/reminders but it all correlates.
Old Entropic Economics
New Negentropic Economics