For Lilian and the Indigos - Above Top Secret
For Lilian and the Indigos - Above Top Secret
For Lilian and the Indigos - Above Top Secret
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
REPLY TO SHERMER<br />
On behalf of metaphysicists, mystics <strong>and</strong> new age, woo woo crackpots everywhere, I’d<br />
like to respond to <strong>the</strong> following written by <strong>the</strong> publisher of Skeptic.<br />
MUSTANGS, MONISTS AND MEANING By Michael Shermer<br />
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN SPECIAL ISSUE – BEYOND EINSTEIN<br />
SEPTEMBER 2004, Page 38<br />
The dualist belief that body <strong>and</strong> soul are separate entities is natural, intuitive <strong>and</strong><br />
with us from infancy. It is also very probably wrong…<br />
Firstly, when a skeptic tries to denounce <strong>the</strong> unknown (as if credible scientists don’t work<br />
with unknowns), he usually keeps <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> argument within classical physics<br />
jargon, essentially denying <strong>the</strong> validity of quantum mechanics <strong>and</strong> direct experience for<br />
assumed “laws.” This is convenient but deceptive. Secondly, in regards to <strong>the</strong> article<br />
itself, Mr. Shermer is rephrasing <strong>the</strong> before/afterlife question within <strong>the</strong> confines of two<br />
possibilities, monism & dualism. With all this restriction, who needs open-mindedness as<br />
in <strong>the</strong> possibility of a third?<br />
The response of children to a dead animal or common use of a phrase is hardly<br />
corroborative evidence for any debate; it is arguably less credible than when children<br />
speak of impossible previous experiences <strong>and</strong>/or display unusual interest or talent, which<br />
strongly supports reincarnation. With <strong>the</strong> skeptic paradigm, we cannot explain how such<br />
fresh biology could possibly develop that level of complexity <strong>and</strong> detail if mind is, as a<br />
skeptic would assert, an emergent phenomena of biology.<br />
There is only so much time for <strong>the</strong> senses to lay down <strong>the</strong> maps before <strong>the</strong>y can be<br />
associated to do anything useful. However if <strong>the</strong> maps were to reside in HyperSpace<br />
instead of DNA – outside of linear time <strong>and</strong> (inertial) mass – <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> knowledge already<br />
exists <strong>and</strong> merely needs to be reverse time modulated or downloaded through <strong>the</strong><br />
quantum foam black holes/closed strings, i.e., <strong>the</strong> logic gates of brane tiles. Learning <strong>the</strong>n<br />
is really remembering; it is what a child is doing when babbling about being killed in a<br />
war or when a five-year old suspected Dalai Lama picks out his Mustang from a pile of<br />
things he’s never seen.<br />
Mr. Shermer <strong>and</strong> I agree that “my soul is a pattern of information.” We part ways,<br />
however, on where that pattern emerges from <strong>and</strong> how it is maintained. The field of<br />
“Quantum Biology” has been around for a LONG time. It’s just that <strong>the</strong> language had to<br />
come full circle as <strong>the</strong> whole BEYOND EINSTEIN issue suggests. All<br />
Psychic/Paranormal phenomena are ei<strong>the</strong>r non-linear or non-local. Objective, repeatable<br />
experiments are difficult because not only do we not know what language to ask <strong>the</strong> right<br />
questions in, <strong>the</strong> best quantum interface is <strong>the</strong> brain <strong>and</strong> only a few freaks know how to<br />
work those phenomena in question consistently – <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y are in caves! No scientist