01.12.2014 Views

agenda city of watsonville city council/redevelopment agency meeting

agenda city of watsonville city council/redevelopment agency meeting

agenda city of watsonville city council/redevelopment agency meeting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pending Threat- Redevelopment Agency (RDA). In addition to the cuts and lay<strong>of</strong>fs<br />

summarized within the General Fund, the City faces the likely potential <strong>of</strong> more General Fund<br />

reductions by the State eliminating or depleting the City’s RDA. The State Governor continued to<br />

propose in his May Revise Budget Report that the State’s legislature should eliminate all<br />

Redevelopment Agencies to provide a projected $1.7 Billion towards the State’s $9.6 Billion<br />

deficit. The State Controller has added considerable pressure by stating he will stop paying State<br />

Legislator’s for each day they don’t adopt a balanced State Budget after June 15, 2011.<br />

There have been several bills presented in the State legislature that will either eliminate the RDA<br />

or put very strong limitations on how RDA funds could be used. Staff feels that even if RDA’s are<br />

not eliminated, it is highly likely their cash and revenue streams will be diverted to the State. In<br />

2009, all the State RDA’s were mandated to remit over 2-years a total <strong>of</strong> $1.7 Billion (the same<br />

amount demanded now). From those 2009 actions, the City lost a combined $3.1 Million that<br />

would have otherwise been used for economic development and other projects.<br />

The General Fund could lose an additional $395,469 in cost allocations and specialized services<br />

for the RDA project area and the City could lose $1,090,684 in RDA operations (including the<br />

$395,469) and several million annually in available project resources. Exhibit 8 below lists the<br />

potential losses to the General Fund ($395,469) and the operating costs <strong>of</strong> the RDA that are in<br />

jeopardy from State action.<br />

Redevelopment Agency Operations<br />

Exhibit 8<br />

Amount<br />

Staffing $ 338,615<br />

Operations 752,069<br />

Direct RDA 2011-2012 Budget $ 1,090,684<br />

General Fund support (subset <strong>of</strong> operations)<br />

Amount<br />

Code Enforcement & Planning $ 79,365<br />

Downtown Promotions & Events 44,473<br />

Specific Financial Accounting & Reporting 41,085<br />

Cost allocation/Overhead 230,546<br />

Total FY 2011-2012 GF Allocation $ 395,469<br />

In addition to the costs in Exhibit 8, the RDA’s elimination would also eliminate the RDA’s<br />

Affordable and Low-Income housing programs. The State is likely to transfer control <strong>of</strong> affordable<br />

housing decisions to a joint county-wide <strong>agency</strong> (like the Santa Cruz County Housing Authority).<br />

Staff have prepared several alternative reduction scenarios and will present those to Council if<br />

the State <strong>of</strong> California passes legislation to eliminate or deplete the RDA’s resources.<br />

Page 7 <strong>of</strong> 15<br />

Pimentel 6/9/2011 4:26:10 PM<br />

P:\budget 2011-2013\Presentations-Reports\2011-0614\SR-BudgetF2_2011-0614.docx

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!