03.01.2015 Views

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

aimed at denying breeding grounds for these grievances through effective management, better<br />

integration and by adopting people centric policies.<br />

Reforms for Capacity Building of LEAs. In most of the developing countries LEAs lack<br />

requisite capability, capacity and integration to fight future wars owing to a host of reasons. Police<br />

reforms should remain the starting point and be followed by civil armed forces to improve<br />

recruiting, development of better hierarchical structures and training to fight cybercrimes.<br />

Inter – State Cooperation. Future warriors are likely to exploit black holes in international law<br />

and discords between nation states to operate beyond national boundaries and closer to seam to<br />

avoid stringent laws and effective LEAs in one state thus bringing into light requirement of<br />

integrating efforts globally and in particular with neighbours and regional countries to deal with<br />

these threats. This is easier said than done.<br />

Capacity Building to Fight 5GW and Open Source Warfare. Creating cyber and space<br />

commands at national and armed forces level to fight cybercrimes, while at the same time,<br />

exercising control over proliferation of bio and nano technologies and developing national capacity<br />

by integrating human and technical elements to protect vital services against hacking remains vital<br />

to fight 5GW. Finally, legislating and then implementing laws against attack on vital assets like<br />

pipelines and grid stations and creating mechanisms to provide comprehensive security to them<br />

should also be pursued.<br />

Recommendations at Army Level<br />

Changes in Military Culture. Earlier generations of war seemed obsessed with order on the<br />

battlefield thus turning militaries into well oiled machines while countering terrorism forces a<br />

change. Difference between the nature of the modern battlefield and the traditional military culture<br />

can be addressed by redefining military cultures by accepting that initiative is more important than<br />

obedience.<br />

Ability to Adapt and Learn. Use of information technology will improve adaptation of<br />

insurgents while also giving them ability to quickly share techniques and lessons learnt from one<br />

geographical zone to another. As David Kilcullen puts it in ‘Accidental Guerrilla’, unless we adapt<br />

to today’s protean adversary and the merging modes of human conflict, “we are destined to<br />

maintain and upgrade our high-end, industrial age square pegs and be condemned for trying to<br />

force them into contemporary and increasingly complex round holes.”<br />

Adaptive Campaigning. Armies may not be able to dominate all aspects of future war but their<br />

role might be a bit toned in support of other elements of national power. As armies shrink in size<br />

and the complexity of intra state problems increases in size and context, militaries will have to<br />

carefully articulate their actions for more enduring results in support of the governmental<br />

departments. This is referred to as adaptive campaigning.<br />

Information Operations and Strategic Communication. Strategic communications is an upand-coming<br />

tool in the adaptive campaigning process and can be used for affecting changes in<br />

societal behaviour by understanding and responding to the thinking of population at large.<br />

Information operations aim at wining the psychological contest with real and potential enemies. A<br />

Whole of Government approach is required for development of Information Action objectives and<br />

Strategic Communication themes by developing credible narratives.<br />

Impact on Tactics and Operational Art in Fourth Generation Operational Art. Principal<br />

notions of operational art apply in 4GW, although context is somewhat changed.<br />

Reduced Emphasis on Operational Art. In fourth generation the first change would be that a<br />

campaign framework may be largely provided to the operational commander for implementation.<br />

In this context, Operational Art is likely to be a little more circumscribed than envisaged and might<br />

involve orchestration of tactical actions, through one or more lines of operation, to ultimately<br />

achieve the directed strategic accepted enduring conditions.<br />

Blending of Tactical and Strategic Levels. As the opponent's political infrastructure and civilian<br />

society become battlefield targets, blending of tactical and strategic levels will be witnessed. In<br />

future wars, spaces will remain important for the operational art and an operational commander<br />

will have to aim at denying critical spaces like population centres etc.<br />

<strong>OPINION</strong> <strong>Vol.1</strong> <strong>No.1</strong> 136 <strong>June</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!