03.01.2015 Views

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

OPINION Vol.1, No.1 June 2013 - National Defence University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

RISING INDIA - A CRITICAL APPRAISAL<br />

More than sixty five years ago, in 1947, the Indian nation was struggling for its very survival.<br />

Recovering from the shattered dreams of ‘Akhand Bharat’ with urgency to resettle eight million refugees;<br />

provided with land, homes, employment and a sense of citizenship. Over five hundred and sixty princely<br />

states 1 had to be integrated. The question then being asked everywhere was ‘Will India Survive’ Now,<br />

sixty-five years down the road, that fearful query has been replaced by a far more impressive one, namely,<br />

‘Will India become a Great Power’<br />

There are different theories which examine the phenomenon of the Rise of the Nations. Professor<br />

Alastair Johnston of Harvard <strong>University</strong> has suggested following criterion 2 :-<br />

In material context, is there an increase in a state’s capabilities in either relative or absolute<br />

sense<br />

In historical context, is the rising state more powerful than the past<br />

In diplomatic context is the state more engaged in the world than previously<br />

In competing context, how do other states view the rising state having a larger role in the world<br />

than in the past<br />

In domestic context, does the state increasingly affect the lives of ordinary people<br />

In terms of measures of power, what are the net capabilities in terms of power projection, control<br />

over territory, alliance construction, share of world material capabilities, and the collective will to<br />

assume the role of a great power.<br />

Keeping the above criterion in mind, does India deserve the status of a great power by any<br />

measure, has to be analysed by close examination of factors like the extent and strategic location of its<br />

territory; the size and dynamism of its population; the value and growth rate of its economy; the increased<br />

trade volume; the inflow of foreign direct investments; the entrepreneurial drive especially in cutting-edge<br />

sectors like information technology; the creation of an ever larger and ever more confident middle class<br />

and the strength of its military.<br />

In international arena, United States needs India to become a true global power so as to guard her<br />

interests in the region. In the historical context India has all the advantages the United States once had in<br />

her infancy: size, diversity, strategic location, a stable government and a thriving economy. Now India<br />

aspires to convert these advantages into raw power. Nonetheless, world will not grant India that status<br />

because of her size and economic potential alone; India has to reach out and grab it 3 . This article is about a<br />

critical appraisal of the Indian competing prospects and problems; enabling or hindering to achieve such a<br />

coveted status.<br />

Important Landmarks from Indian History<br />

In 1950, India’s share of global wealth was just over four percent as compared to sixteen percent in<br />

1820 4 ; erosion of Indian wealth continued after independence. Marginal growth rates with phenomenal<br />

expansion in population made rich richer and poor a bit less poor. Between 1950 and 1980, the socialist<br />

model remained applied in India and produced disappointing results. Over a period of 30 years, India’s<br />

gross domestic product (GDP) grew by an average of 3.7 per cent per annum while the population virtually<br />

got doubled from 372 to 689 million people. The per capita annual average growth rate was a mere 1.5 per<br />

cent. It came to be known as the ‘Hindu Rate of Growth’ 5 .<br />

In 1980s, the Indian Government displayed reluctance to turn back on longstanding policy of<br />

curbing and regulating the private sector. Rajiv Gandhi on assumption of office, committed himself to<br />

deregulation, import liberalization and access to foreign technology, recognizing the role of private sector<br />

in economic development. 6 It was only in the early 1990s that there was an evident radical change in<br />

course. The immediate cause for this change was the threat of bankruptcy facing the Indian state in 1991.<br />

Major shift in Indian foreign policy was also noticed in 1990s 7 . The cardinal of change included shift from<br />

a ‘Socialist to building a ‘Modern Capitalist Society’ with increased emphasis on geo-economics. Here,<br />

India also started cherishing status of an emerging global power status with demonstration of flexibility to<br />

heed to pro-west alliances; shift from idealism to realism.<br />

<strong>OPINION</strong> <strong>Vol.1</strong> <strong>No.1</strong> 33 <strong>June</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!