Report - United States Department of Defense
Report - United States Department of Defense
Report - United States Department of Defense
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
UNCLASSIFIED<br />
late in the planning process and, as a result, their completion dates are in a high risk category <strong>of</strong><br />
not meeting the December 2014 NTM-A and ANSF construction deadline.<br />
IJC’s Unified Implementation Plan provides the overall mission control for retrograde <strong>of</strong> forces<br />
in Afghanistan, which includes the transfer or closure <strong>of</strong> fixed infrastructure. Regional<br />
commands nominate bases for consideration to close or transfer. Decisions are driven primarily<br />
by operational factors, as well the timing and location <strong>of</strong> future builds. Sustainability, based on<br />
manning and O&M funding, is also a significant factor driving these decisions.<br />
GIRoA’s position on ISAF infrastructure is to transfer all current structures and not close<br />
any. Although this process is not without tension, the GIRoA-led Base Closure Commission<br />
currently allows the NDS, MoI, MoD, MoF, and MAIL to assume control over sites if it meets<br />
the scope <strong>of</strong> their function and is also sustainable. ISAF is sensitive to destruction <strong>of</strong><br />
infrastructure that could potentially have value to Afghans. IJC is exploring options to dispose<br />
<strong>of</strong> such material in Afghanistan, including to local authorities and residents.<br />
ANP Infrastructure<br />
The ANP has completed 65 percent (496 <strong>of</strong> 765) <strong>of</strong> its major infrastructure projects. Significant<br />
construction progress has been made across all ANP forces on the strategic fielding plan. The<br />
program requirements have been locked and emphasis has shifted from acquisition to execution.<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> the reporting period, NTM-A had 246 projects, valued at $1.3B, under construction<br />
for the ANP. Another 22 projects for $1.6M are in the acquisition phase. As <strong>of</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reporting period, a total <strong>of</strong> 495 projects valued at $1.57B have been completed to date. NTM-A<br />
is actively executing the last remaining projects in the program, with a schedule to award all<br />
remaining infrastructure projects by June 2013 in order to compete all construction by December<br />
2014.<br />
The ANP program is accelerating in terms <strong>of</strong> bringing projects to completion. As the program<br />
moves out <strong>of</strong> the winter months, the pace <strong>of</strong> construction is improving and numerous projects are<br />
moving into their final phases. The number <strong>of</strong> projects coming to completion on a monthly basis<br />
is forecasted for improvement, barring any changes in the security posture. Of the nearly 280<br />
projects left for execution in the program, approximately five percent have significant issues<br />
resulting in delays.<br />
Suitable land (clear title to MoI, good proximity, buildable area, access to water, etc.) remains<br />
the most significant challenge to the ANP construction program. Many projects have been<br />
delayed or cancelled due to land disputes or the inability to find suitable land and water.<br />
Facilities Maintenance<br />
Facility maintenance is a tremendous challenge for the ANSF. As more than 3,900 projects<br />
come to completion, the ANSF will need to fully develop its own organic capability to maintain<br />
facilities. Limiting factors include the inability to hire and retain facility engineers; a lack <strong>of</strong><br />
Garrison Support Units; ongoing construction <strong>of</strong> new facilities; and the termination <strong>of</strong> CF-<br />
115