19.01.2015 Views

MOLPRO

MOLPRO

MOLPRO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26 OPEN-SHELL COUPLED CLUSTER THEORIES 195<br />

26 OPEN-SHELL COUPLED CLUSTER THEORIES<br />

Spin unrestricted (RHF-UCCSD) and partially spin restricted (RHF-RCCSD) open-shell coupled<br />

cluster theories as described in J. Chem. Phys. 99 (1993) 5219 (see also erratum, J. Chem.<br />

Phys., 112 (2000) 3106) are available in <strong>MOLPRO</strong>. In both cases a high-spin RHF reference<br />

wavefunction is used. No coupled cluster methods based on UHF orbitals are implemented in<br />

<strong>MOLPRO</strong> (the only correlation method in <strong>MOLPRO</strong> which uses UHF orbitals is UMP2). In the<br />

description that follows, the acronyms RCCSD and UCCSD are used, but the theories should<br />

normally be referred to as RHF-RCCSD, RHF-UCCSD, in order to distinguish them from alternative<br />

ansätze based on spin-unrestricted orbitals. The program will accept either the full or<br />

abbreviated acronyms as input commands.<br />

In the RCCSD theory certain restrictions among the amplitudes are introduced, such that the<br />

linear part of the wavefunction becomes a spin eigenfunction (this is not the case in the UCCSD<br />

method, even if an RHF reference function is used). At present, the implementation of RCCSD<br />

is only preliminary, and no CPU time is saved by as compared to UCCSD. However, improved<br />

algorithms, as described in the above publication, are currently being implemented, and will be<br />

available in the near future.<br />

The input is exactly the same as for closed-shell CCSD, except that RCCSD or UCCSD are used<br />

as keywords. By default, the open-shell orbitals are the same as used in the RHF reference<br />

function, but this can be modified using OCC, CLOSED, and WF cards.<br />

Perturbative triples corrections are computed as follows:<br />

RCCSD(T), UCCSD(T)<br />

RCCSD[T], UCCSD[T]<br />

RCCSD-T, UCCSD-T<br />

triples corrections are computed as defined by J. D. Watts, J. Gauss<br />

and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 98 8718 (1993).<br />

corrections are computed without contributions of single excitations<br />

(sometimes called CCSD+T(CCSD)) .<br />

triples corrections are computed as defined by M. J. O. Deegan and<br />

P. J. Knowles, Chem. Phys. Letters 227 (1994) 321.<br />

In fact, all three contributions are always computed and printed. The following variables are<br />

used to store the results (here CCSD stands for either UCCSD or RCCSD):<br />

ENERGY<br />

ENERGC<br />

ENERGT(1)<br />

ENERGT(2)<br />

ENERGT(3)<br />

total energy for method specified in the input.<br />

total CCSD energy without triples.<br />

total CCSD(T) energy.<br />

total CCSD[T] energy.<br />

total CCSD-T energy.<br />

It should be noted that in open-shell cases the triples energy slightly depends on the treatment of<br />

core orbitals. In <strong>MOLPRO</strong> pseudo-canonical alpha and beta spin orbitals (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-<br />

2614(91)85118-G) are generated by block-diagonalizing the corresponding Fock matrices in the<br />

space of valence orbitals, leaving frozen core orbitals untouched. Some other programs include<br />

the frozen core orbitals in the canonicalization and transformation. Because of core-valence<br />

mixing this leads to slightly different energies. Neither of the two methods can be regarded as<br />

better or more justified — it is just a matter of definition. However, the method in <strong>MOLPRO</strong> is<br />

more efficient since the subsequent integral transformation involves only valence orbitals and<br />

no core orbitals.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!