1.1 Porphyrins - Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
1.1 Porphyrins - Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
1.1 Porphyrins - Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3 Discussion and Results<br />
first reduction potential of a standard tetraarylporphyrin. As one could have expected, the<br />
shift should be doubled compared to the one in 53 in respect to non-annulated systems. But<br />
that is not at all the case, since also here, the positioning of the exocycles turns out decisive.<br />
The lowest shifts are observed for 3 & 17 bis-annulated systems 67 and 69, higher ones for<br />
71 (3 & 7 bis-annulated) and the highest for 68 and 70 being annulated in diagonal fashion (3<br />
& 13). Additionally, not only the reduction potentials themselves are shifted but also their<br />
difference ΔE½ Red is affected. While in 67, 69 and 71 the Δ value is approx. 0.36 V, in 68 and<br />
70 only half the value (0.19 V and 0.18 V) is found. Therewith it can be nicely proven, that<br />
the setup of analog systems of different symmetries provides a nice tool to fine-tune their<br />
electronic properties due to effects on the shapes and coefficients of their frontier orbitals.<br />
Table 22. Half-wave potentials E½ given in V versus ferrocene, E(Fc/Fc + ) = +0.53 V, obtained<br />
from measurements in CH2Cl2 solution (c = 10 -3 M). For the exact experimental setup see<br />
paragraph 6.1, p. 139.<br />
104<br />
Compound E½ Red2 [V] E½ Red1 [V] E½ Ox1 [V] E½ Ox2 [V]<br />
67 -<strong>1.1</strong>5 -0.79 +<strong>1.1</strong>0 +1.38<br />
68 -0.86 -0.67 +1.07 +1.31<br />
69 -<strong>1.1</strong>6 -0.79 +<strong>1.1</strong>0 +1.38<br />
70 -0.85 -0.67 +1.08 +1.31<br />
71 -1.04 -0.69 +1.05 +1.31<br />
53 96 -1.23 -0.95 +1.02 +1.25<br />
15 a,112<br />
-1.45 -<strong>1.1</strong>4 +1.05 +1.35<br />
a literature data on 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin (see Scheme 6, p. 7) a<br />
3.2.7.7 Preferential Formation of Certain BCKPs during Synthesis<br />
After having discussed the properties of the setup BCKPs, the remainder question, why some<br />
of those are preferentially formed during synthesis, shall be clarified. As already mentioned,<br />
the 3 & 17 bis-annulation appears favored over the corresponding double ring closure in 3 &<br />
13 fashion by approximately 4 : 1. This could be generally due to electronic and/or steric<br />
reasons. Assuming, both annulations take place in a successive manner, the distortional<br />
effect of the first exocycle on shape and coefficients of the frontier orbital to be attacked has<br />
to be taken into account. A further effect could arise from the paramagnetic metal center by<br />
spin delocalization effects as copper(II) complexes were used. Also, the steric impact of the<br />
first cyclization could provide a preference as one pyrrolic unit might be deviated from