10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

196 | Nick Bostrom<br />

A Relational Component?<br />

Let us return to the <strong>Dignity</strong> as a Quality of individuals. One might<br />

attribute <strong>Dignity</strong> as Quality to an individual not only because of her<br />

intrinsic characteristics but, arguably, also because of her relational<br />

properties. For example, one might think that the oldest tree has a<br />

<strong>Dignity</strong> as a Quality that it would not possess if there were another<br />

tree that was older, or that the last of the Mohicans had a special<br />

<strong>Dignity</strong> as a Quality denied to the penultimate Mohican.<br />

We humans like to pride ourselves on being the smartest <strong>and</strong><br />

most advanced species on the planet. Perhaps this position gives us a<br />

kind of <strong>Dignity</strong> as a Quality, one that could be shared by all humans,<br />

including mediocrities <strong>and</strong> even those who fall below some nonhuman<br />

animals in terms of cognitive ability. We would have this special<br />

<strong>Dignity</strong> as a Quality through our belonging to a species whose membership<br />

has included such luminaries as Michelangelo <strong>and</strong> Einstein.<br />

We might then worry that we would risk losing this special dignity<br />

if, through the application of radical enhancement technologies, we<br />

created another species (or intelligent machines) that surpassed human<br />

genius in all dimensions. Becoming a member of the secondmost<br />

advanced species on the planet (supposing one were not among<br />

the radically enhanced) sounds like a demotion.<br />

We need to be careful here not to conflate <strong>Dignity</strong> as a Quality<br />

with other concepts, such as social rank or status. With the birth<br />

of cognitively superior posthumans, the rank of humans would suffer<br />

(at least if rank were determined by cognitive capacity). It does<br />

not follow that our <strong>Dignity</strong> as a Quality would have been reduced;<br />

that is a separate question. Perhaps we should hold, rather, that our<br />

<strong>Dignity</strong> as a Quality would have been increased, on grounds of our<br />

membership in another collective—the Club of Tellurian Life. This<br />

club, while less exclusive than the old Club of <strong>Human</strong>ity, would<br />

boast some extremely illustrious members after the human species<br />

had been eclipsed by its posthuman descendants.<br />

There might nevertheless be a loss of <strong>Dignity</strong> as a Quality for<br />

individual human beings. Those individuals who were previously at<br />

the top of their fields would no longer occupy such a distinguished<br />

position. If there is a special <strong>Dignity</strong> as a Quality (as opposed to<br />

merely social status) in having a distinguished position, then this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!