10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

396 | David Gelernter<br />

religious idea, even if God never comes up. In sum, many bioethicists<br />

would rather go on using the term while forgetting the definition—<br />

why rent a car when you can borrow one?—all the while assuring us<br />

that man is merely one species among many <strong>and</strong> hence entitled to<br />

nothing special.<br />

I’ve claimed that human sanctity is grounded in the idea of God’s<br />

having created man in His image, <strong>and</strong> I’ve referred to this as a “religious”<br />

argument. But I don’t really mean it—don’t mean religion<br />

in a general sense; I mean Biblical religion. (I include Islam insofar<br />

as it acknowledges the Bible’s truth <strong>and</strong> has in principle many close<br />

connections to Judaism.) Indeed, man’s being created in the image<br />

of God is the basic, defining characteristic of Biblical as opposed to<br />

other religions; everything else flows from this seminal assertion in<br />

Genesis. This becomes clear when we compare the revolutionary assertion<br />

in Genesis to the pagan view it replaced. Pagans believed that<br />

the gods were made in man’s image. (Of course I don’t want to call<br />

the great religions of the east “pagan”; but from certain angles they<br />

resemble pagan more than Biblical religion, <strong>and</strong> particularly in this<br />

respect.) What was the meaning <strong>and</strong> force of Judaism’s startling assertion<br />

that man had been made in God’s image instead of vice versa?<br />

If man is made in God’s image, man’s goal must be not to accept<br />

his animal nature but to transcend it; not to “blend into” nature or<br />

“become one with” nature or with the universe but to raise himself<br />

above nature; not to be himself but to be better than himself. Hence<br />

he must struggle toward goodness <strong>and</strong> sanctity. He can never reach<br />

that goal, not entirely, any more than he can become the deity he (in<br />

some sense) resembles, any more than Moses (in the most powerful<br />

metaphor in the Bible) was able to reach the Promised L<strong>and</strong>. But he<br />

must try.<br />

This seems like a lot of religious doctrine to swallow. Surely such<br />

things could only be germane to devout Jews <strong>and</strong> Christians (<strong>and</strong><br />

perhaps to Muslims). But when <strong>and</strong> if we accept (explicitly or otherwise)<br />

the Ten Comm<strong>and</strong>ments <strong>and</strong> the Holiness Code as the basis of<br />

our ethics, this is the God <strong>and</strong> the story we implicitly accept.<br />

“<strong>Human</strong> sanctity” has other properties that make it useful in<br />

bioethics—at least to some bioethicists. The hardest bioethical problems<br />

often involve the creation of human life: for example, abortion,<br />

cloning, designer babies, <strong>and</strong> other related topics. Some thinkers are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!