10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Dignity</strong> <strong>and</strong> Respect for Persons | 29<br />

an ambitious but precisely detailed agenda, along with a set of specified<br />

outcomes or required “deliverables”; with one exception, the<br />

“deliverables” were all inquiries involving human subjects research,<br />

anchored to the explicit expectation that their findings <strong>and</strong> recommendations<br />

would inform, or even decisively shape, the formation of<br />

federal law <strong>and</strong> regulation. Since its inception, the President’s Council<br />

has labored under an altogether different m<strong>and</strong>ate, as is clear in<br />

this passage from Executive Order 13237:<br />

The Council shall advise the President on bioethical issues<br />

that may emerge as a consequence of advances in biomedical<br />

science <strong>and</strong> technology. In connection with its advisory role,<br />

the mission of the Council includes the following functions:<br />

(1) to undertake fundamental inquiry into the human <strong>and</strong><br />

moral significance of developments in biomedical <strong>and</strong> behavioral<br />

science <strong>and</strong> technology; (2) to explore specific ethical<br />

<strong>and</strong> policy questions related to these developments; (3) to<br />

provide a forum for a national discussion of bioethical issues;<br />

(4) to facilitate a greater underst<strong>and</strong>ing of bioethical issues;<br />

<strong>and</strong> (5) to explore the possibilities for useful international<br />

collaboration on bioethical issues.<br />

The “deliverables” that the Council has been expected to produce<br />

are not specified reports on a prescribed list of topics: they are,<br />

instead, advice to the President; a forum for public discussion <strong>and</strong><br />

to foster underst<strong>and</strong>ing of bioethical issues; <strong>and</strong>, by implication, the<br />

fruits of its “fundamental” inquiries <strong>and</strong> of its explorations of “specific<br />

ethical <strong>and</strong> policy questions.” As I previously noted, particular problems<br />

in bioethics were important in the genesis of both the National<br />

Commission <strong>and</strong> the President’s Council; <strong>and</strong> thus, in the creation<br />

of both there was, more or less, a degree of external compulsion or<br />

need. The agenda that the President’s Council has pursued has not,<br />

however, been strictly tethered to the morality of embryonic stem<br />

cell research, the dilemma that attended its birth. On several different<br />

occasions, for varying lengths of time, the President’s Council<br />

has explored this topic, as well as the related topic of human cloning,<br />

<strong>and</strong> issued reports on both; but it has also undertaken inquiries<br />

into biotechnology <strong>and</strong> human enhancement, assisted reproduction,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!