10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Dignity</strong> <strong>and</strong> Respect for Persons | 35<br />

Notes<br />

1<br />

Ruth Macklin, “<strong>Dignity</strong> Is A Useless Concept,” BMJ 327 (2003): 1419-1420.<br />

2<br />

Ibid., p. 1420.<br />

3<br />

See chapter 12, “Genetics, freedom <strong>and</strong> human dignity,” of the Nuffield Council<br />

report, available online at www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/behaviouralgenetics/publication_311.html.<br />

4<br />

Macklin, loc. cit.<br />

5<br />

Ibid.<br />

6<br />

Rapid responses to Macklin’s editorial are published online at www.bmj.com/<br />

cgi/eletters/327/7429/1419.<br />

7<br />

See James H. Jones’s Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (New York: The<br />

Free Press, 1981).<br />

8<br />

Resources on the history <strong>and</strong> sequelae of the Tuskegee study are numerous. A<br />

portal to internet-based resources is available online at www.gpc.edu/~shale/humanities/composition/assignments/experiment/tuskegee.html.<br />

9<br />

Henry K. Beecher, “Ethics <strong>and</strong> Clinical Research,” New Engl<strong>and</strong> Journal of Medicine<br />

274 (1966): 1354-1360.<br />

10<br />

Ibid. p. 1360.<br />

11<br />

Most of the reports of the National Commission are available online from the<br />

website of the President’s Council on <strong>Bioethics</strong> at www.bioethics.gov/reports/past_<br />

commissions/index.html.<br />

12<br />

The Belmont Report was approved by the National Commission at its 42nd meeting<br />

on June 10, 1978, <strong>and</strong> published in the Federal Register on April 18, 1979.<br />

Citations in this essay are to a reprint of the report included as an appendix (pp.<br />

253-265) to Belmont Revisited: Ethical Principles for Research with <strong>Human</strong> Subjects,<br />

ed. James F. Childress, Eric M. Meslin, <strong>and</strong> Harold T. Shapiro (Washington, D.C.:<br />

Georgetown University Press, 2005).<br />

13<br />

For discussion, see Evelyne Shuster, “Fifty years later: the significance of the<br />

Nuremberg Code,” New Engl<strong>and</strong> Journal of Medicine 337 (1999): 1436-1440. The<br />

Nuremberg Code is available online at: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html.<br />

14<br />

Belmont Report, p. 255.<br />

15<br />

Ibid.<br />

16<br />

Ibid.<br />

17<br />

Ibid., p. 256.<br />

18<br />

Ibid.<br />

19<br />

Ibid., p. 257.<br />

20<br />

Ibid.<br />

21<br />

Ibid., p. 260.<br />

22<br />

Albert Jonsen, “On the Origins <strong>and</strong> Future of the Belmont Report,” in Belmont<br />

Revisited, p. 8.<br />

23<br />

Tom L. Beauchamp, “The Origins <strong>and</strong> Evolution of the Belmont Report,” in<br />

Belmont Revisited, p. 19.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!