10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Dignity</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Bioethics</strong> | 493<br />

though it has human genes. As a different kind of thing, a mole does<br />

not have intrinsic dignity. Therefore, the possibility of mole formation<br />

is not an argument that a human embryo in the Petri dish does<br />

not have intrinsic dignity. If what is in the dish is a human embryo,<br />

then it has intrinsic dignity. If what is in the dish is a mole, then it<br />

does not.<br />

Interpreted as an epistemological argument, however, this line of<br />

reasoning suggests that, because one might not be able to determine<br />

until later in development whether what is growing in the uterus or<br />

the Petri dish is a mole, one therefore cannot speak meaningfully of<br />

the intrinsic dignity of a five-day old blastocyst. It is true that, in<br />

vivo, given current technology, there is no good way to tell an embryo<br />

from a mole at 5 days of developmental age. In vitro, by contrast, it<br />

has been demonstrated that even at the 2-cell stage one can detect<br />

characteristic abnormalities in hydatidiform moles. 40 However, prescinding<br />

from the question of whether one has epistemic access to<br />

the true (if modest) essence of the thing undergoing development,<br />

as a practical matter this possibility does not seem morally decisive.<br />

Moles are rare. If there is a 99.9% chance that what I see stirring in<br />

the woods is a fellow hunter, <strong>and</strong> a 0.1% chance that it might be a<br />

deer, prudence suggests not shooting. And any epistemic doubts I<br />

might have about what stirs—in the woods, the womb, or the Petri<br />

dish—do not suffice to change the ontological status of the thing<br />

that stirs. There is a correct answer to the question, is this a mole or<br />

an embryo? If what is in the dish is an individual member of the human<br />

natural kind in the embryonic stage of development, then it has<br />

intrinsic dignity. My uncertainty does not change the kind of thing<br />

that it is, nor does my uncertainty change its intrinsic value.<br />

A theory of dignity that can provide such explanations <strong>and</strong> guidance<br />

in moral decision-making about the treatment of human embryos<br />

would not seem useless.<br />

Cloning to Bring Babies to Birth<br />

All of the arguments I raised above about why it is a violation of<br />

intrinsic human dignity to destroy already existing human embryos<br />

for research purposes apply a fortiori to creating human embryos

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!