10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Nature <strong>and</strong> Basis of <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Dignity</strong> | 431<br />

Notes<br />

1<br />

See Jenny Teichman, Social Ethics: A Student’s Guide (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).<br />

2<br />

Peter Singer, “All Animals are Equal,” in Morality in Practice, 4th edition, ed.<br />

James P. Sterba (Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1994), p. 478, quoting Jeremy<br />

Bentham’s Introduction to the Principles of Moral <strong>and</strong> Legislation (1789), chapter<br />

17.<br />

3<br />

Peter Singer, op. cit., p. 441.<br />

4<br />

Jeff McMahan, whose views are in other respects more complex than Singer’s,<br />

still holds that only interests are of direct moral concern, <strong>and</strong> explicitly recognizes<br />

<strong>and</strong> accepts this logical consequence. See his The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the<br />

Margin of Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 205-206.<br />

5<br />

Peter Singer, op. cit., p. 484, emphasis added.<br />

6<br />

Richard Arneson, “What, If Anything, Renders All <strong>Human</strong>s Morally Equal?”<br />

in Singer <strong>and</strong> his Critics, ed. Dale Jamieson (Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell,<br />

1999), pp. 103-127, at p. 105.<br />

7<br />

This is our solution to what Richard Arneson calls “the Singer problem.” See<br />

Richard Arneson, loc. cit.<br />

8<br />

Paul Taylor, “The Ethics of Respect for Nature,” in Morality in Practice, 4th edition,<br />

ed. James P. Sterba (Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1994), p. 488.<br />

9<br />

Cf. Louis G. Lombardi, “Inherent Worth, Respect, <strong>and</strong> Rights,” Environmental<br />

Ethics 5 (1983): 257-270.<br />

10<br />

David Oderberg, Applied Ethics: A Non-Consequentialist Approach (Oxford:<br />

Blackwell, 2000), p. 101.<br />

11<br />

For example, Taylor, op. cit.<br />

12<br />

Aristotle, De Anima III.4.<br />

13<br />

See Joel Wallman, Aping Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,<br />

1992), especially chapters 5 <strong>and</strong> 6.<br />

14<br />

Cf. Richard J. Connell, Logical Analysis: An Introduction to Systematic Learning<br />

(Edina, Minnesota: Bellwether Press, 1981), pp. 87-93; John Haldane, “The<br />

Source <strong>and</strong> Destination of Thought,” in Referring to God: Jewish <strong>and</strong> Christian<br />

Philosophical <strong>and</strong> Theological Perspectives, ed. Paul Helm (New York: St. Martin’s<br />

Press, 2000); Mortimer Adler, Intellect: Mind Over Matter (New York: Macmillan,<br />

1990); Russell Pannier <strong>and</strong> Thomas D. Sullivan, “The Mind-Marker,” in Theos, Anthropos,<br />

Christos: A Compendium of Modern Philosophical Theology, ed. Roy Abraham<br />

Varghese (New York: Peter Lang, 2000); James F. Ross, “Immaterial Aspects<br />

of Thought,” Journal of Philosophy 89 (1992): 136-150.<br />

15<br />

Mortimer Adler noted that, upon extended observation of other animals <strong>and</strong> of<br />

human beings, what would first strike one is the immense uniformity in mode of<br />

living among other animals, in contrast with the immense variety in modes of living<br />

<strong>and</strong> customs among human beings. See Mortimer Adler, op. cit.<br />

16<br />

Cf. Roger Scruton, Sexual Desire: A Moral Philosophy of the Erotic (New York:<br />

The Free Press, 1986).<br />

17<br />

This point is developed in James B. Reichmann, Evolution, ‘Animal Rights,’ <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!