10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

64 | Robert P. Kraynak<br />

immaterial minds. Hobbes was a strict materialist in asserting that<br />

thinking or consciousness is simply a motion in the brain <strong>and</strong> that<br />

language is a motion of the tongue (he denied, in other words, that<br />

mental states of inner awareness existed in addition to brain waves).<br />

He opposed the dualism of matter <strong>and</strong> mind as both unnecessary <strong>and</strong><br />

as politically dangerous insofar as it led to beliefs in souls <strong>and</strong> spirits<br />

that could be exploited by religious leaders for rebellion against<br />

political authority. Hobbes also denied the essential difference of<br />

humans <strong>and</strong> animals <strong>and</strong> therefore rejected any notion of human<br />

dignity based on a hierarchy of beings in the universe as a dangerous<br />

illusion that led to vainglorious claims of superiority <strong>and</strong> wars<br />

of religion. He asserted that all human beings are equal in their vulnerability<br />

to being killed <strong>and</strong> that mankind would be better off if<br />

everyone accepted their status as mortal machines without inherent<br />

dignity. For Hobbes, this was the whole truth about man—the low<br />

but solid ground on which to build an enlightened, secular civilization<br />

that could avoid the anarchy of the state of nature <strong>and</strong> establish<br />

lasting civil peace.<br />

Despite his determined effort to be a thorough-going materialist,<br />

Hobbes seemed to admit that the human mind could not simply<br />

fit the model of a machine. He recognized that the activity of science<br />

itself, especially political science, stood outside the determinism<br />

of nature because the mind could construct an artificial world of<br />

speech based on free choices of the will in defining words—the very<br />

words needed for the social contracts of politics <strong>and</strong> the method of<br />

exact science. As Hobbes claimed, “we know only what we make,”<br />

by which he meant that the mind could construct systems of knowledge<br />

outside the world of mechanical causality, <strong>and</strong> that these logical<br />

constructs were the only certain knowledge. Hobbes therefore contradicted<br />

himself by assuming something like an immaterial mind or<br />

soul which distinguished human beings from animals <strong>and</strong> enabled<br />

them to overcome nature. In the last analysis, then, Hobbes acknowledged<br />

that the whole truth about man included body <strong>and</strong> soul.<br />

It would be an oversimplification to say that all scientific materialists<br />

have been Hobbesians, but Hobbes provided the model of<br />

mechanical man for later materialists to refine <strong>and</strong> develop. His daring<br />

conception became a prototype for behavioral psychology <strong>and</strong> its<br />

offshoots—for the physical-chemical model of mental <strong>and</strong> emotional

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!