10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

230 | Peter Augustine Lawler<br />

The Christian Underst<strong>and</strong>ing of <strong>Human</strong> Freedom<br />

Our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the dignity of the individual or the person<br />

originates, I think, with Christianity, particularly with St. Augustine.<br />

We find it in Augustine’s criticism of the civil <strong>and</strong> natural theologies—the<br />

respectable theologies—of the Greeks <strong>and</strong> the Romans<br />

for misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing who the human being is. Civil theology—the<br />

gods of the city or political community—is based on the premise<br />

that human beings are essentially citizens or part of a city. But that’s<br />

not true. <strong>Human</strong> longings point beyond one’s own country <strong>and</strong> can’t<br />

be satisfied by any kind of political dedication or success. It’s finally<br />

undignified or untruthful for a Roman to identify himself or his fate<br />

with Rome. Augustine didn’t deny there was a certain nobility or<br />

dignity of citizens who subordinated their selfish interests for their<br />

country’s common good. But even or especially the best Romans<br />

were looking in the wrong place for genuine personal security <strong>and</strong><br />

significance or immortality. They were looking in the wrong place for<br />

personal meaning or transcendence or perfection. 2<br />

The polytheism of civil theology was also undignified insofar as<br />

it was an offense against the human mind. It required that educated<br />

men degrade themselves by feigning belief in unbelievable gods<br />

<strong>and</strong> engage in a futile effort to fend off moral deterioration as their<br />

country became more sophisticated. Such efforts were also degrading<br />

to others; they opposed the particular human being’s efforts to free<br />

himself from what are finally selfish communal illusions. Civil theology,<br />

by defining us as citizens <strong>and</strong> nothing more, hides from us the<br />

dignity that all human beings share in common.<br />

Sophisticated Greeks <strong>and</strong> Romans, Augustine adds, rejected the<br />

gods of their country for nature’s God, the God of the philosophers.<br />

But that growth in theological sophistication in the direction of impersonal<br />

monotheism was only ambiguously progress. All reasonable<br />

theology is monotheistic; the orderly universe <strong>and</strong> essentially equal<br />

human beings must be governed by a single God. But Augustine still<br />

saw two problems with nature’s God. First, he is too distant or too<br />

impersonal to provide any real support for the moral duties of particular<br />

human beings; dignified personal action or personal existence<br />

can’t be based on a God that is finally not a “who” but a “what.”<br />

Second, natural theology is based on the premise that the human

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!